From what I've seen/read (which doesn't make it true), the basis of this attempted 'override' is re: supposed 'exposure of sensitive private/personal data of tax payers' (probably the same argument they'll use re: trying to block an audit of the IRS).
I've also seen/read (which doesn't make it true) that the Treasury literally doesn't even keep records of its payments (which would conveniently make audits impossible), so if there's no data on where the money went, how would any 'personal/private data be exposed?
IMO, this is all just a smokescreen and delay tactic as cabal players inside the govt. are feverishly trying to destroy records and delete as much as they can.
From what I've seen/read (which doesn't make it true), the basis of this attempted 'override' is re: supposed 'exposure of sensitive private/personal data of tax payers' (probably the same argument they'll use re: trying to block an audit of the IRS).
I've also seen/read (which doesn't make it true) that the Treasury literally doesn't even keep records of its payments (which would conveniently make audits impossible), so if there's no data on where the money went, how would any 'personal/private data be exposed?
IMO, this is all just a smokescreen and delay tactic as cabal players inside the govt. are feverishly trying to destroy records and delete as much as they can.
I guess it is a delay tactic then.
That's what my gut says on this subject. The DS won't win though, as we know. :-)
Amen. God is with us.