And the democrats rush to the defense that the antiquated COBOL SSA programming defaults the birth date to 1875?!? They and the gov't should be embarrassed and humiliated to put forth such a pathetic excuse!
WHY?? Can't they even accept that the audit is valuable and necessary for pointing out this obvious absurdity??
They assume and justify that it is just the way it was programmed?? Like that is OK??
Like the programming should not be changed and dates of birth not be verified?? It is just OK to cut money to SSA recipients that have not been verified as an actual unique LIVING person??
SHEESH their idiocy is beyond belief! To get the left to defend something, all we have to do it point out something! HA!
And you nail it right up front, ArmyLady -- friggin COBOL! I deal with several pre-Y2K systems in DoD on a daily basis, that I'm absolutely ASTOUNDED that they're still allowed to exist. But there's probably a reason for that....
And the democrats rush to the defense that the antiquated COBOL SSA programming defaults the birth date to 1875?!? They and the gov't should be embarrassed and humiliated to put forth such a pathetic excuse!
WHY?? Can't they even accept that the audit is valuable and necessary for pointing out this obvious absurdity??
They assume and justify that it is just the way it was programmed?? Like that is OK??
Like the programming should not be changed and dates of birth not be verified?? It is just OK to cut money to SSA recipients that have not been verified as an actual unique LIVING person??
SHEESH their idiocy is beyond belief! To get the left to defend something, all we have to do it point out something! HA!
And you nail it right up front, ArmyLady -- friggin COBOL! I deal with several pre-Y2K systems in DoD on a daily basis, that I'm absolutely ASTOUNDED that they're still allowed to exist. But there's probably a reason for that....