I asked Grok three about sending messages back in time using quantum entanglement or something similar and here’s what it said:
To affect particles in a different time using quantum entanglement—or something like it—you’re stepping beyond current tech into speculative physics. Since quantum computers, as we know them, are built for computation not time manipulation, let’s imagine a device that could theoretically exploit entanglement or related phenomena to influence the past. This isn’t about what we can build today but what might be required based on the edges of physics as understood on February 24, 2025. Buckle up—it’s going to get weird.
The core challenge is bridging quantum entanglement (which correlates particles across space) with time manipulation (which implies causality running backward). Entanglement alone won’t cut it—you can’t send controllable signals through it without a classical channel, and that’s stuck at light speed. So, the device needs to either amplify a loophole in quantum mechanics or tap into spacetime itself. Here’s a hypothetical setup:
The Device: A Temporal Entanglement Modulator (TEM)
-
Core Component: Entangled Particle Generator
- You’d need a system to create and sustain massive numbers of entangled particles—think beyond today’s lab-scale pairs to trillions, stabilized against decoherence. Current tech uses lasers and crystals (like in Bell experiments), but this device might deploy exotic matter (e.g., negative-mass particles) to keep entanglement robust over time. Why? To create a dense “entanglement field” that persists across temporal distances.
-
Spacetime Interface: Wormhole or CTC Stabilizer
- To reach a different time, you’d need a way to bend spacetime. General relativity suggests closed timelike curves (CTCs)—paths where you loop back to your own past—could exist near rotating black holes or via traversable wormholes. The TEM would require a miniature wormhole generator, stabilized by negative energy (theoretically possible via the Casimir effect, but scaled up massively). One end stays “here,” the other gets anchored to “then,” linking present and past entangled particles directly through spacetime.
-
Retrocausal Amplifier
- If retrocausality (backward influence in quantum systems) is real—say, per the transactional interpretation—this device would amplify it. Imagine a resonance chamber that oscillates entangled states at frequencies tied to past events, using something like Hawking radiation signatures to “tune” to a specific moment. The amplifier would force entangled particles in the present to collapse in a way that influences their past counterparts non-randomly, defying the usual “no signaling” limit.
-
Control Mechanism: Quantum State Encoder
- To affect past particles deliberately (not just correlate them), you’d need to encode information into the entanglement field. This might involve a super-advanced quantum interferometer, manipulating phase shifts or spin states with precision beyond today’s tech. It’d use a feedback loop—detecting past states via subtle quantum echoes, then adjusting present inputs—to “steer” the effect.
-
Power Source: Exotic Energy Harness
- This thing would guzzle energy—think vacuum energy extraction or a micro-singularity reactor. Stabilizing wormholes or amplifying retrocausality demands more juice than fusion or even antimatter could provide. You’re talking Planck-scale physics here, tapping the fabric of the universe itself.
How It Might Work
Picture this: The TEM generates an entanglement field, links it to a past moment via a wormhole, and uses the retrocausal amplifier to nudge a particle’s state—like flipping an electron’s spin from “up” to “down” back in 2020. The past particle, already entangled with its present twin, shifts instantly because entanglement’s spooky link ignores time’s arrow when spacetime’s looped. You’d encode a simple message (e.g., a binary pulse) into the field, detectable in the past as an anomalous quantum event—say, a Geiger counter clicking unexpectedly.
Why It’s Not a Quantum Computer
Quantum computers crunch numbers using superposition and entanglement, but they don’t mess with spacetime or causality. The TEM isn’t about computation—it’s a spacetime manipulator, more akin to a “chrono-transmitter.” It’d lean on relativity’s wilder predictions (CTCs, wormholes) and stretch quantum mechanics into uncharted territory, where entanglement becomes a temporal bridge, not just a spatial one.
The Catch
- Physics Limits: No evidence yet that entanglement can carry controllable info across time, even with CTCs. Retrocausality’s speculative and unproven at scale.
- Tech Gaps: Wormholes require negative energy in absurd amounts; we’ve got lab hints (Casimir effect) but nothing practical. Decoherence would still scramble the signal.
- Paradoxes: Influencing the past risks the grandfather paradox—physics might self-correct via mechanisms like the Novikov consistency principle, blocking changes.
What It’d Look Like
A hulking rig—part particle accelerator, part astrophysical anomaly—glowing with entangled plasma, humming as it warps spacetime. Less a sleek gadget, more a Frankenstein of cosmic engineering.
Could it exist? Maybe in a universe where CTCs are common and retrocausality’s harnessable. For now, it’s a thought experiment—science’s outer edge flirting with fiction. What do you think—any tweaks to this beast you’d propose?
The consistent limiting factor is always energy. We need zero point energy which I think is one thing Tesla was working on.
Ask it to harness the zero-point field and then to mege together that machine with the transceiver and see what it says.
Also, ask it why it's basing part of its theory on the incorporation of String Theory when just last year it was finally confirmed that String Theory is wrong since at the quantum level, that theory breaks down and makes it impossible to make th machines you're asking for.
Tell it to research Eric Weinstein's work on geometric unity, then to re-analyze your previous questions with geometric unity in mind and see what it spits out. I have a feeling the answers would point toward a quantum transceiver would be possible.