"employer" and "employee" refer to a relationship with the federal government
Yes, basically, but in different ways in each of Chapters 21-24 (make a mental note of the topics of those four chapters as I stated, for future reference). Thank you for noticing! Yet because of the differences, it's dangerous to generalize, and that's why, unless you see the whole unfolded, it's easy to make statements that contain enough indirect error to be ruled as frivolous by administrative judges. E.g., it's not only government workers and workers in DC. When people try to make such summary statements the trap is right there. Only relying upon the words of the law directly is sufficient.
The Fed, the fiat, the banks are also other aspects of other schemes, but do not affect the operation of the tax code.
If I never enter a contract how can I be liable? And no law can compel a person to perform an act against their will or enter into a contract unwillingly.
Great question. The answer is that if you are paid by another person, that's an oral contract, and if the other person conveys testimony to the IRS in the form of a tax return stating that the money paid was a category of income then that's the testimony they like to run with. The law provides you recourse if the payor's testimony was mistaken, namely to submit the corrected record (filing is not a liability-creating contract per se, it's a self-assessment and a testimony). The law also provides that after enough time, a couple years, if there is no self-assessment the IRS is empowered to address the testimony it received by assessing you on your behalf, because you abrogated that right by neither affirming nor correcting the testimony they received about you. If you continue inaction the law does eventually permit your property, or you, to be seized, regardless of the fact that your conscience was honored by the system (you were never compelled to act against your conscience, you were just jailed). That's the nature of the beast: it's designed to make everyone feel they are stuck paying just like everyone else.
But we also observe that if you're rich enough you can have people research the law and find ways to pay less than everyone else. That's because it's still an excise, meaning it's avoidable. We are also told repeatedly by the Supremes that the right to labor for pay is a basic property right that cannot be infringed by an excise, which much be on avoidable activity. But they don't want to tell us the resolution of these things. Not filing is not the resolution because it's an abrogation of duty, an "easy out", and a very high risk to you as it goes on year after year. The resolution is to structure and report your affairs in compliance with all law such that the excise for which you are liable is an acceptable amount and within your rights and duties. Because of the Constitutional right to labor for pay, this path is always available to the American.
Since you've researched, do you know what an information return is? Maybe you've received one this year, a copy of one that was sent by the payor to the IRS, stating that you received money last year that fell in certain categories defined by certain form boxes (usually more than one available) according to the definitions in the code? If you know you haven't, great! If you don't know, or if you know you have, then I'd look into where those boxes get their definitions. If you want to know more, pick one of the most common information return forms and we'll look at it in more detail.
Yes, basically, but in different ways in each of Chapters 21-24 (make a mental note of the topics of those four chapters as I stated, for future reference). Thank you for noticing! Yet because of the differences, it's dangerous to generalize, and that's why, unless you see the whole unfolded, it's easy to make statements that contain enough indirect error to be ruled as frivolous by administrative judges. E.g., it's not only government workers and workers in DC. When people try to make such summary statements the trap is right there. Only relying upon the words of the law directly is sufficient.
The Fed, the fiat, the banks are also other aspects of other schemes, but do not affect the operation of the tax code.
Great question. The answer is that if you are paid by another person, that's an oral contract, and if the other person conveys testimony to the IRS in the form of a tax return stating that the money paid was a category of income then that's the testimony they like to run with. The law provides you recourse if the payor's testimony was mistaken, namely to submit the corrected record (filing is not a liability-creating contract per se, it's a self-assessment and a testimony). The law also provides that after enough time, a couple years, if there is no self-assessment the IRS is empowered to address the testimony it received by assessing you on your behalf, because you abrogated that right by neither affirming nor correcting the testimony they received about you. If you continue inaction the law does eventually permit your property, or you, to be seized, regardless of the fact that your conscience was honored by the system (you were never compelled to act against your conscience, you were just jailed). That's the nature of the beast: it's designed to make everyone feel they are stuck paying just like everyone else.
But we also observe that if you're rich enough you can have people research the law and find ways to pay less than everyone else. That's because it's still an excise, meaning it's avoidable. We are also told repeatedly by the Supremes that the right to labor for pay is a basic property right that cannot be infringed by an excise, which much be on avoidable activity. But they don't want to tell us the resolution of these things. Not filing is not the resolution because it's an abrogation of duty, an "easy out", and a very high risk to you as it goes on year after year. The resolution is to structure and report your affairs in compliance with all law such that the excise for which you are liable is an acceptable amount and within your rights and duties. Because of the Constitutional right to labor for pay, this path is always available to the American.
Since you've researched, do you know what an information return is? Maybe you've received one this year, a copy of one that was sent by the payor to the IRS, stating that you received money last year that fell in certain categories defined by certain form boxes (usually more than one available) according to the definitions in the code? If you know you haven't, great! If you don't know, or if you know you have, then I'd look into where those boxes get their definitions. If you want to know more, pick one of the most common information return forms and we'll look at it in more detail.