I agree with you on that point, sort of. GAW has morphed into a bit of a news aggregation site, with lots of posters not even bothering to reference sauce in their titles, just copy pasting. There's very little + alpha. Just copy paste. I find this disappointing.
On that note, I appreciate you attempting to look at the DJT post and figure out if it means something, BUT I also think that it's very flimsy.
is it interdasting that Johnson invited Potus to address a joint session on March 4th? Possibly. Formerly inauguration day, ok.
However, such broad speculation that it's significant needs to be augmented by factual information.
I think the basic premise, that DJT "hinted at a March 4 inauguration" in this tweet is a bit wild.
If one HAS the foundation, all the other things in place, the facts, ties, connections, THEN a 'hint' like this might be relevant. But the problem is, all those others things are not there. Just pure speculation.
let me illustrate giving an example. The "air Qs". Now, some folks swear thjat any time DJT does the circle and points at someone, that it's an air Q. (Myself, I think that some were, but also that this is a favorite gesture of DJT, and that not all of the gestures are Air Qs.)
But, the foundation for looking at a particular gesture by DJT and interpreting it as some sort of comms - air q - came on the extremely solid foundation of the Q operation, the drops, the whole Q movement, running for many months, and lots and lots of data points telling us that DJT is "Q+" etc.
On that solid and broad foundation, interpreting the simple gesture as an 'air q' makes sense.
BUT, if that solid foundation wasn't there, if, for example, prior to the Q drops, Trump had drawn the gesture, it would be a wild leap to interpret it as some sort of signal about the letter Q.
In my view, we are in a completely different phase of things now. The Q drop operation is over. It extended for a period of roughly 3 years, and had a specific purpose. So there is no real or logical reason for DJT to be dropping secret comms in this way now. I agree that some things are there - the 'weaves'' where if you know, you know, and we can observe DJT communicating on various levels.
But DJT somehow hinting that there was a secret inauguration on March 4 - what purpose would that serve?
I think we need to direcft our mental efforts and research efforts in a new direction now. DJT is not in 2017-2020 mode. Nor is the work.
Times change, the war moves into different phases, and warriors need to adjust, step up, and find out what the 'mandate' is that we now have.
Sorry. I'm not sure that's allowed here. Or if it is, maybe avoid DOING it aloud.
It's too bad. I used to come on here quite a bit but it's nearly been reduced to a news feed :(
I agree with you on that point, sort of. GAW has morphed into a bit of a news aggregation site, with lots of posters not even bothering to reference sauce in their titles, just copy pasting. There's very little + alpha. Just copy paste. I find this disappointing.
On that note, I appreciate you attempting to look at the DJT post and figure out if it means something, BUT I also think that it's very flimsy.
is it interdasting that Johnson invited Potus to address a joint session on March 4th? Possibly. Formerly inauguration day, ok.
However, such broad speculation that it's significant needs to be augmented by factual information.
I think the basic premise, that DJT "hinted at a March 4 inauguration" in this tweet is a bit wild.
If one HAS the foundation, all the other things in place, the facts, ties, connections, THEN a 'hint' like this might be relevant. But the problem is, all those others things are not there. Just pure speculation.
let me illustrate giving an example. The "air Qs". Now, some folks swear thjat any time DJT does the circle and points at someone, that it's an air Q. (Myself, I think that some were, but also that this is a favorite gesture of DJT, and that not all of the gestures are Air Qs.)
But, the foundation for looking at a particular gesture by DJT and interpreting it as some sort of comms - air q - came on the extremely solid foundation of the Q operation, the drops, the whole Q movement, running for many months, and lots and lots of data points telling us that DJT is "Q+" etc.
On that solid and broad foundation, interpreting the simple gesture as an 'air q' makes sense.
BUT, if that solid foundation wasn't there, if, for example, prior to the Q drops, Trump had drawn the gesture, it would be a wild leap to interpret it as some sort of signal about the letter Q.
In my view, we are in a completely different phase of things now. The Q drop operation is over. It extended for a period of roughly 3 years, and had a specific purpose. So there is no real or logical reason for DJT to be dropping secret comms in this way now. I agree that some things are there - the 'weaves'' where if you know, you know, and we can observe DJT communicating on various levels.
But DJT somehow hinting that there was a secret inauguration on March 4 - what purpose would that serve?
I think we need to direcft our mental efforts and research efforts in a new direction now. DJT is not in 2017-2020 mode. Nor is the work.
Times change, the war moves into different phases, and warriors need to adjust, step up, and find out what the 'mandate' is that we now have.
$0.02
🤣