John, You make my brain🧠 hurt at times but I'll give it my best: as follows:🤞 Predictive programming is often understood as a concept where media—TV shows, movies, or other cultural artifacts—embed ideas, events, or outcomes into the public consciousness, potentially to desensitize or prepare people for future events. These examples, like The Dead Zone episode "Plague" (Season 2, Episode 14, aired July 13, 2003) mentioning hydroxychloroquine as a cure for a Chinese respiratory virus, or The Blacklist referencing "Wonderland" in connection to Saudi Arabia, align with themes Q has pointed to as evidence of foreknowledge or hidden messages. Q’s posts often suggested that certain events were scripted or signaled in advance, whether by malevolent forces or, as you propose, by "White Hats" (benevolent insiders). refill- vodka' time- brb - thanks for understanding. Ok, your key argument seems to hinge on reinterpreting this phenomenon: rather than assuming all predictive programming serves a "Black Hat" (evil cabal) agenda, you suggest that some instances might come from "White Hats"—those who are working against the darkness. You tie this to Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s letter to Trump, which Q shared (notably on June 6, 2020, per drop #4461), where Viganò frames the world as a battleground between "children of light" and "children of darkness." You extend this to argue that "Brothers of Light" might have been subtly influencing media to drop hints or rally support for their cause. The I, Pet Goat II example is particularly interesting to me. This animated show by Heliofant is dense with symbolism: George W. Bush morphing into Barack Obama, a serpent-like AI figure, and a Christ-like character emerging victorious. I still refer it as being labeled "cabal predictive programming" -some who see it as a boastful display of elite control. But your twist—asking why a "Black Hat" would depict their own defeat—suggests an alternative: perhaps the creator (a "Brother of Light") intended it as a subversive message of hope, showing the "good guys" triumphing over corrupt powers (Bush, Obama, communism, etc.). So, what’s the "kitty" you dropped? Of that I am not sure- you are quite cryptic and Do Indeed make one use their braincells, I could be wrong but this is what I read out of it: the hint that predictive programming might not always be a tool of the oppressors, but could sometimes be a weapon of the resistance—a coded message from White Hats to awaken or encourage those paying attention. You’re challenging the default assumption that all such media is sinister, proposing instead that some creators might be embedding truth to undermine the "evil Cabal losers" from within. it’s a compelling idea. If true, it reframes works like I, Pet Goat II or specific TV episodes as potential acts of defiance rather than compliance. The "White Hats" could be using the same cultural tools as their adversaries, but to a different end—planting seeds of awareness rather than submission. The logical conclusion, as you put it, is that not every eerie coincidence in media is a flex of power; some might be a wink from the good guys, saying, "We’re here, and we’re fighting." It’s a plausible theory, especially given how opaque the intentions behind art and media can be. The Dead Zone episode does feel oddly prescient—hydroxychloroquine wasn’t a household name in 2003, yet it fits neatly into later Q narratives about COVID-19. And I, Pet Goat II’s imagery does lean toward a redemptive arc, which clashes with the idea of a cabal gloating over inevitable victory. -that's all I can think of at this time. Thank you an awful lot John for giving me this to even think on let alone even try to solve. - I appreciate your input at all times in all posts. - much appreciated friend. Cheers and thanks again, 🍻