I agree that there may not be a reason to remove her SS detail, but I'm curious as to why she received protection in the first place? Sure, maybe while her father was pResident, but why are the American tax payers paying for SS coverage for the adult family members of former Presidents? Current Presidents... sure, protect everyone including the family dog. Former Presidents... protect them. Just them. If the family wants protection, they xan move in with dad (or mom, if we elect a female president).

(This is commentary on the idea of SS protection, no shade intended to the comment above or to OP)