Heck, I haven't been able to keep up with all the releases. Did this one get covered, where previously redacted areas had the redaction removed?? The phrases "S t a t i o n C h i e f" and " C I A" seem to pop out a lot!
This document only has a couple blurbs regarding JFK (his nickname was "Ruby", his actual last name was "Rubenstein"). The page numbers also skip pretty bad; however the redactions and references as to how regime changes in South American countries by a Certain Instigation Agency are all over the place.
Just to be clear from the beginning, I'm not trying to start a fight or anything of that nature. I'm just curious why people do this type of thing;
Certain Instigation Agency
Why do people try to disguise who they're talking about like this? Are they trying to avoid triggering some sort of alert that would put their comments up for scrutiny by intelligence agencies?
I'm not trying to embarrass or single you out. Just finally decided to ask why people do this.
I'm sure we're all on multiple databases, with ratings ranging from "standard braindead zombie-no concerns" to "Just short of Cooper or Gunderson action required". When the wall fell in Germany, people were looking into what notes the communist intelligence services had on them and I'm sure it was an eye opener.
I'm sure all our e-mails, online keyboard comments and forwarded documents are stored/rated as part of our "Issue to Deal With" score. At a base level, I'm sure there's algorithms scouring for keywords to start that process, then I'd imagine it moves up to "analyst level" items, and I'm sure that now there's been AI involved for a while.
I've lost family members that in hindsight were probably secretly "dealt with". I have no intention of making there job any easier at this point. Hope that helps.
That intelligence agencies haven't figured out they disguise references like that, or they're not able to include disguised references in programs scouring posts for any mention of intelligence agencies?
Heck, I haven't been able to keep up with all the releases. Did this one get covered, where previously redacted areas had the redaction removed?? The phrases "S t a t i o n C h i e f" and " C I A" seem to pop out a lot!
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/157-10002-10165.pdf
This document only has a couple blurbs regarding JFK (his nickname was "Ruby", his actual last name was "Rubenstein"). The page numbers also skip pretty bad; however the redactions and references as to how regime changes in South American countries by a Certain Instigation Agency are all over the place.
Just to be clear from the beginning, I'm not trying to start a fight or anything of that nature. I'm just curious why people do this type of thing;
Why do people try to disguise who they're talking about like this? Are they trying to avoid triggering some sort of alert that would put their comments up for scrutiny by intelligence agencies?
I'm not trying to embarrass or single you out. Just finally decided to ask why people do this.
I'm sure we're all on multiple databases, with ratings ranging from "standard braindead zombie-no concerns" to "Just short of Cooper or Gunderson action required". When the wall fell in Germany, people were looking into what notes the communist intelligence services had on them and I'm sure it was an eye opener. I'm sure all our e-mails, online keyboard comments and forwarded documents are stored/rated as part of our "Issue to Deal With" score. At a base level, I'm sure there's algorithms scouring for keywords to start that process, then I'd imagine it moves up to "analyst level" items, and I'm sure that now there's been AI involved for a while. I've lost family members that in hindsight were probably secretly "dealt with". I have no intention of making there job any easier at this point. Hope that helps.
Yes, that is why.
Do they think that actually works, though?
That intelligence agencies haven't figured out they disguise references like that, or they're not able to include disguised references in programs scouring posts for any mention of intelligence agencies?