Second Batch of JFK Assassination Files Released by National Archives | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
The National Archives has unveiled a significant release of JFK assassination documents, following a presidential directive for transparency. This new batch promises to shed light on historical mysteries surrounding the event.
Do they think that actually works, though?
That intelligence agencies haven't figured out they disguise references like that, or they're not able to include disguised references in programs scouring posts for any mention of intelligence agencies?
Speaking from my personal viewpoint, no I don't think it really matters or works. Maybe at one point years back it served purpose and actually disguised the agency in question, but by now they've surely expanded their boolean vocabulary to include all these popular "workarounds."
I think some of the reasons people like to do it (at least the folks here)has to do with the Q posts too. They frequently used: 🤡 In America or Clowns In America
to reference the agency in question.
I think others began to do it partially as a show of homage to the Q posts or just imitate the style (the greatest form of flattery, as they say).
It's also a way to show a little invention and creativity in your writing and posts, I think. It's good for a laugh when you read
and then maybe get inspired come up with one of your own, which gets a laugh in turn and maybe a few people copycat that and one guy comes up with his own
and on it goes.
And I'm just now thinking of this, but it probably does get hella annoying for them to have to continually add all these different acronyms and such to their search terms to stay on the cutting edge and figure out what we're saying about them.
But does it prevent anything or "throw them off the trail" in some way? Err, probably not anymore...
Just my thoughts.
That all makes a lot of sense. Thanks for taking the time to respond.