While I do not doubt the negative impact of the jab on new, aggressive cancers, there is something to be said about several other potential mitigating factors:

1. mammograms, first recommended at age 40 (annually) and then every 2 years starting at age 50. Some women with breast cancer in the family are urged to get annual mammograms in their 30s. Nothing like a dose of radiation into susceptible breast tissue every year. Ironically, health insurance does not typically cover Ultrasound Mammograms (obviously much safer since there is no radiation) which are commonly used for more detailed analysis if a standard mammogram finds something, but that's common among health insurer bullshit.

2. a wild card happens to be sunscreen. Now while this is more relevant to skin cancers, could the toxins common in sunscreens also play a part in breast cancer development since even in a bikini or one-piece, breast tissue can still be exposed to the sun, and there would be a desire to lather that shit everywhere?

The pancreatic cancers, especially in young adults, are most certainly a result of the jab, and it could certainly be causing rises in early breast cancer (under the age of 50), but I think there may be a perfect storm situation when tied to the mammogram component, at the very least.