Standard Operating Procedure would be for the originator of the meeting to establish a distribution / invitation list. Does this guy really have the authority to determine who participates in such discussions? Either someone is not maintaining organizational discipline, or someone is insubordinate, or both.
Standard Operating Procedure would be for the originator of the meeting to establish a distribution / invitation list. Does this guy really have the authority to determine who participates in such discussions? Either someone is not maintaining organizational discipline, or someone is insubordinate, or both.
Was Jeffrey Goldberg on the list by name? I am hearing that there was someone identified as "JR," but the system associated it with Goldberg.
No argument over confidentiality. This was more a matter of privacy than security.