"Keir Starmer is an unhinged lunatic pushing us all toward nuclear war," Peter Hitchens writes in the Daily Mail, predicting World War III if British troops appear in Ukraine.
"Nuclear war is now far more likely than it was before. I’ll explain why shortly. And the budding warmonger Keir Starmer needs to grasp this. Keir, once a Cold War-era peace advocate in his youth, is seriously considering sending troops to Ukraine, which would instantly provoke war with Russia.
Moscow will never tolerate the open deployment of NATO troops, just as the US wouldn’t tolerate Chinese forces in Mexico or Russian bomber bases in Ireland. Lost in a superpower madness, Keir delivers public lectures to Russian President Vladimir Putin, telling him how bad he is.
If you’ve seen the Terminator films, you probably know that in such a war, hydrogen bombs would burn us all alive and turn our cities into craters. Russians are harder to hit with this weapon than we are because their country is so vast.
Does the government realize what toys it’s playing with? What specific reason justifies putting this country at such risk?"
Well yeah. This is what he wants and what his handlers (Mandelson and Blair et al) want. They are also trying to provoke the population into rising up against them so the can crack down violently using the military and muslims.
The article points out that Russia doesn't need to drop a bomb on the UK. They just need to blow some up at high altitude to trigger an EMP. Such an attack would make Britain basically a medieval nation once more, as it would effectively fry the power grid and most of the systems (transportation, the Thames barrier, banking systems, etc).
There is a lot of stuff British people need electricity for, and the grid here, like in America, isn't robust enough to survive a pulse attack like that. And when it goes down, everything goes with it, effectively. Kier would be a fool to even let a single member of the army step foot in Ukraine for a war based purpose.
A Russian hypersonic weapon can arrive in 7mins....will they even able to respond in time or in kind? I hope Parliament's in session and the target at this point I don't care if the Russians finish what Guy Fawkes Started.
I love England but a lot eggs will need to be broken before it's return.
Full transcript:
"Keir Starmer is an unhinged lunatic pushing us all toward nuclear war," Peter Hitchens writes in the Daily Mail, predicting World War III if British troops appear in Ukraine.
"Nuclear war is now far more likely than it was before. I’ll explain why shortly. And the budding warmonger Keir Starmer needs to grasp this. Keir, once a Cold War-era peace advocate in his youth, is seriously considering sending troops to Ukraine, which would instantly provoke war with Russia.
Moscow will never tolerate the open deployment of NATO troops, just as the US wouldn’t tolerate Chinese forces in Mexico or Russian bomber bases in Ireland. Lost in a superpower madness, Keir delivers public lectures to Russian President Vladimir Putin, telling him how bad he is.
If you’ve seen the Terminator films, you probably know that in such a war, hydrogen bombs would burn us all alive and turn our cities into craters. Russians are harder to hit with this weapon than we are because their country is so vast.
Does the government realize what toys it’s playing with? What specific reason justifies putting this country at such risk?"
Well yeah. This is what he wants and what his handlers (Mandelson and Blair et al) want. They are also trying to provoke the population into rising up against them so the can crack down violently using the military and muslims.
“His” army, as in the British Army, has only a few thousand combat ready troops. Has given most of its heavy artillery and armour to Ukraine.
The civil service bureaucracy has hollowed out what was once a viable fighting force.
In other words, they are now a joke of an army who can’t even defend their own borders. I don’t think Putin is losing much sleep.
They would be vaporised in less than a week. But maybe that’s what WEF faggot Starmer wants.
this is how America ends up annexing Canada... England is destroyed.
that works, 'kill two birds with one stone'.
The article points out that Russia doesn't need to drop a bomb on the UK. They just need to blow some up at high altitude to trigger an EMP. Such an attack would make Britain basically a medieval nation once more, as it would effectively fry the power grid and most of the systems (transportation, the Thames barrier, banking systems, etc).
There is a lot of stuff British people need electricity for, and the grid here, like in America, isn't robust enough to survive a pulse attack like that. And when it goes down, everything goes with it, effectively. Kier would be a fool to even let a single member of the army step foot in Ukraine for a war based purpose.
A Russian hypersonic weapon can arrive in 7mins....will they even able to respond in time or in kind? I hope Parliament's in session and the target at this point I don't care if the Russians finish what Guy Fawkes Started.
I love England but a lot eggs will need to be broken before it's return.