You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
I doubt they supported "Kill or subjugate all who don't revere a mass-murdering pedophile and rapist, worship his god, follow his barbaric rules that say adherents must kill and fight until all are made to submit." But yes, you're right - they didn't spell that out. That's what Constitutional amendments are for.
You can go by what they wrote, or by what you think they meant. Others may read minds differently though. And the framers cant be asked what they really meant when they wrote something that seems misleading, or like misinformation.
I doubt they supported "Kill or subjugate all who don't revere a mass-murdering pedophile and rapist, worship his god, follow his barbaric rules that say adherents must kill and fight until all are made to submit." But yes, you're right - they didn't spell that out. That's what Constitutional amendments are for.
I woulda set it up different, but there it is.
Also what the USS Constitution was for.