Did you read the article? Essentially, the article is describing Roberts stepping in to ensure that things go Trump's way.
The "meddling" spin is by an MSM outlet that is decidedly putting an anti-Trump, anti-Roberts spin on their report.
I'm not saying I'm necessarily a fan of Roberts, but leaping to conclusions and succumbing to bias confirmation are constant risks when dealing with information, especially when touted by MSM / Corporate media operations.
What is your point when judge roberts is the same head of the supreme court who was responsible for ALL 11 FISA judges who allowed illegal spying on Trump!!! See https://x.com/catturd2/status/1908136700112474151
More comments below in this thread
Did you read the article? Essentially, the article is describing Roberts stepping in to ensure that things go Trump's way.
The "meddling" spin is by an MSM outlet that is decidedly putting an anti-Trump, anti-Roberts spin on their report.
I'm not saying I'm necessarily a fan of Roberts, but leaping to conclusions and succumbing to bias confirmation are constant risks when dealing with information, especially when touted by MSM / Corporate media operations.
What is your point when judge roberts is the same head of the supreme court who was responsible for ALL 11 FISA judges who allowed illegal spying on Trump!!! See https://x.com/catturd2/status/1908136700112474151 More comments below in this thread
See my comment to you elsewhere in the thread.
Seems to me that Roberts is a captured piece.