I assumed the number was sequential and ever-growing, so it would have reached the 907 range based on how busy it has been up to this point, and will stay there based on how many posts and interactions happen while in the 907 range.
15 years previously the numbers were much smaller/many fewer digits and then it was also believed to be a constantly accumulating sequential number. So this probably still holds true now.
I assumed the number was sequential and ever-growing, so it would have reached the 907 range based on how busy it has been up to this point, and will stay there based on how many posts and interactions happen while in the 907 range.
15 years previously the numbers were much smaller/many fewer digits and then it was also believed to be a constantly accumulating sequential number. So this probably still holds true now.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/843667/what-is-the-number-in-a-twitter-status-update-url