This does bring up an interesting question.

If it is two or more vaccines that 79.4% of SIDS cases had, then it is true that 79.4% of SIDS cases did have one vaccine on the same day. It’s just not a fully accurate representation of the situation, but it’s also not false.

However, a few things occur from that. If vaccines aren’t actually safe or beneficial, which is a possibility, then it’s inaccurate in a positive direction.

• “If they’re safe, then why are two a problem, but one isn’t?”
• “Why doesn’t anyone ever tell us about the risks involved with vaccinations, like autism, SIDS, allergies, and other issues, when they’re known by the administrators?”
• “Why are these mandatory for so many things if there are known severe risks? Shouldn’t that call fall to the parent?”

It’s totally possible to look at this meme as a troll, which opens up a conversation into some very important issues we haven’t been able to discuss. If someone is good at that approach, and if vaccines aren’t safe, that aspect could open up some good avenues of discussion - “talking past the sale”, as it were.

Not saying trolling is right or wrong, but a certain Papi Trumo does it all the time, and it does seem to work.

Two threads with lots of info on this:

• https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MhFkcC/vaccinations-autism-rates-the-la/
• https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0ogHaiZ/58-to-78-of-sids-deaths-are-coin/c/

If they’re intentionally murdering us, is the bigger issue that a meme should say “two” vaccines instead of “one” to be fully accurate, or that they’re definitely murdering us and lying about it, and we need to figure out how to get ground-level eyes looking at this in earnest to figure out precisely what’s going on and get the word out? Why aren’t they telling us about these correlations?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BH6Prr1nvJY&t=140