The article in the screenshot has been moved, but the supporting data is in the reference document at the beginning of my post.
What's being asserted here in the image is not supported by this data. Here's the key line from the paper:
For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. The most common vaccines in children were DTaP-HepB-IPV + Hib + PCV7 or PCV13 (n = 127 [8.7%]) followed by HepB vaccine given alone (n = 115 [7.8%]).
What's being said here is that from the VAERS report database, of all the infants who died shortly after being vaccinated, 79.4% died one day or less after getting vaccinated.
This is obviously horrific. But we lose arguments when we make unsubstantiated claims and I am now very concerned that people who don't see this comment are taking this image and posting it on X. There's no faster way to lose a debate than to overstate one's argument.
EDIT: THE ASSERTION MADE IN THE IMAGE ABOVE IS NOT CORRECT.
The actual background data is in this link (after doing a bit of digging): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6771280/
The article in the screenshot has been moved, but the supporting data is in the reference document at the beginning of my post.
What's being asserted here in the image is not supported by this data. Here's the key line from the paper:
For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. The most common vaccines in children were DTaP-HepB-IPV + Hib + PCV7 or PCV13 (n = 127 [8.7%]) followed by HepB vaccine given alone (n = 115 [7.8%]).
What's being said here is that from the VAERS report database, of all the infants who died shortly after being vaccinated, 79.4% died one day or less after getting vaccinated.
This is obviously horrific. But we lose arguments when we make unsubstantiated claims and I am now very concerned that people who don't see this comment are taking this image and posting it on X. There's no faster way to lose a debate than to overstate one's argument.