Do we know if ownership transfer excluded government use? Or was it ownership with use leased/allowed to continue?
Because if this Florida company had ownership but the government continued to use the addresses, literally every byte sent through those addresses could be legally recorded forever by that Florida company. They could set up their own internal version of the NSA's huge data warehouse, log everything - emails, web requests, searches, everything. Even encrypted SSL communications can be stripped by the company - many corporations for example bar use of certain browsers that will warn users when their company uses spoofed security certificates so the company can snoop on their gmail account's encrypted data. The company itself can do that because all of the computers and network traffic are in their property. And this third party company wouldn't have existing government employees there to delete everything compromising should nefarious people realize what happened afterward.
And "as a private company they can do what they want" - meaning its not subject to government oversight. This argument is what "they" have used constantly about everything they defend. From domestic spy programs to the DNC itself not allowing its voters to select a presidential candidate, "private company, it can do what it likes" has been the constant excuse.
This florida company could easily flip that back if that was why they took those addresses, because now that the ownership is returned it means that wasn't just a direct purchase. Something was done and I'm curious if it was data ownership with a routing loop through Florida owned black boxes in the name of "network security" or "management" that might just have every communication and metadata for every day's news reaction.
Everything done on computers in the White House, Congress, every agency, USAID, even phone communications when on government wifi for the last 4 years may just be available to a certain Florida company. And to be blunt, the loudest most suspect members of Congress don't strike me as intelligent enough to disable wifi when communicating with criminal cohorts about sensitive things on their phones.
Do we know if ownership transfer excluded government use? Or was it ownership with use leased/allowed to continue?
Because if this Florida company had ownership but the government continued to use the addresses, literally every byte sent through those addresses could be legally recorded forever by that Florida company. They could set up their own internal version of the NSA's huge data warehouse, log everything - emails, web requests, searches, everything. Even encrypted SSL communications can be stripped by the company - many corporations for example bar use of certain browsers that will warn users when their company uses spoofed security certificates so the company can snoop on their gmail account's encrypted data. The company itself can do that because all of the computers and network traffic are in their property. And this third party company wouldn't have existing government employees there to delete everything compromising should nefarious people realize what happened afterward.
And "as a private company they can do what they want" - meaning its not subject to government oversight. This argument is what "they" have used constantly about everything they defend. From domestic spy programs to the DNC itself not allowing its voters to select a presidential candidate, "private company, it can do what it likes" has been the constant excuse.
This florida company could easily flip that back if that was why they took those addresses, because now that the ownership is returned it means that wasn't just a direct purchase. Something was done and I'm curious if it was data ownership with a routing loop through Florida owned black boxes in the name of "network security" or "management" that might just have every communication and metadata for every day's news reaction.
Everything done on computers in the White House, Congress, every agency, USAID, even phone communications when on government wifi for the last 4 years may just be available to a certain Florida company. And to be blunt, the loudest most suspect members of Congress don't strike me as intelligent enough to disable wifi when communicating with criminal cohorts about sensitive things on their phones.
He Caught Them All.
I always wondered what could be done with the addresses because it looked like something fun.
What you just described sounds fun to me!
premonition.ai