Dianne Feinstein championed this during her lifetime. She wanted to make the 1A something only "Bona Fide" government licensed and approved people can have.
She succeeded in doing that to the 2A, and they want to do it to every human right.
Honestly I think its the fact that the internet always remembers and "the cover up is bigger than the crime"
Newsweek can claim they were fooled like so many actual innocent victims. Worst case, money trail may implicate some complicit criminals within Newsweek. Communications trail may implicate more. But thats as far as it would go. If they cover it up now, that implicates Newsweek as complicit all the way to now and expands the guilty network to whoever does the deleting (not the same as writing/publishing) and who is there right now ordering the cover up that wasn't there years ago during the propaganda campaign.
I usually discard this kind of hyperbole, but seriously, during covid supposedly the flu 100% vanished? Gone? and then came back? Thats not hyperbole its manure. They renamed Flu "Covid" and cranked their Tyranny machine to full throttle. I tried to logically argue against the "covid is the flu" hypothesis but I failed to come up withany logical arguments against it. All of the covid "facts" were lies. It didn't just kill whole crowds of people in the street simultaneously like those China videos. It didn't kill more people than the flu. It was so 'dangerous" that symptoms were literally anything? Even no symptoms is a symptom? Seriously I'm supposed to believe that? And then they start testing random plants and inanimate objects and they are supposedly sick with covid? Viruses jsut don't work like that - the fact is viruses that infect as many animal species as they claim Covid could infect are pretty rare already, but those do at least exist. But plants? Objects? No thats more bullcrap.
So yeah. I "trust the science" - but only because I apply the scientific thought process. test a hypothesis. Reason through it. Try to prove it wrong. When its wrong, your hypothesis had a flawed hypothesis and its time to evaluate the data and change your assumptions based on what you learned.
The scientific process said covid story was a lie all along and a lot of people were required to keep pushing the lie across so many different strata of society across the globe. Thats a lot of organized maliciousness.
Thats the one! Gore won Florida, he dropped out of the race when he was winning on election night. They came up with months of "recounting" under the "hanging chad" excuse to lend legitimacy to that whole faked election and the whole part you're misremembering was an incredibly convoluted and silly way to smooth out the voting discrepancies that forced Gore to quit while he had already won. They have since practiced the recount process and no longer use "hanging chad" terminology but still claim to need weeks/months to manufacture the predetermined outcomes.
Its not like that was the first time the Bush family was involved in a Presidential shake up that went against the desires of voters. Ask his dad where he was when JFK died! The part that really got me was that Gore was aware of the predetermined outcome and played his part in quitting while he was winning, instead of doing what any actual candidate who wanted to win would do. Of course, if I was part of a fake election that big, against a family that had already been involved in the crimes they had gotten away with, I'd have been just as scared of accidentally winning and probably have done the same thing.
They often make it obvious. Remember when Al Gore dropped out of the race on election night when he had already won? They had to come up with a bizarre excuse and delay "counting votes" for months because he won but Bush was supposed to be the predetermined outcome. When I saw a presidential winner drop out while in the lead literally on election night, I realized the entire system was an act.
They really hate the fact that they put that "Insurrection" card on the table and happily established that even the most minor thing like BEING EXPLICITLY INVITED INTO A GOVERNMENT BUILDING is punishable with 4 years in prison. Actual federal crimes under the same charges must absolutely fill their pants with yesterday's junkfood.
Even if they pass, expect a weird legal nothingburger battle. Remember Brexit? British voters voted for it, tyrants never allowed their vote to actually matter. Meanwhile the USA only actually exists because Americans figured out that letting them disarm us leads to voting being pretend forever with no hope of actually making a difference. Canada didn't figure that out so tyrants have no fear of Canadians.
The diddy arrest came after a bunch of unseals, and that one opened a lot of eyes. People who wouldn't talk are now discussing past abuses of children like Bieber etc, pointing out that these crimes have been high profile and in everybodys faces for so long the guilty are flaunting it.
The last president to actually move on this was JFK. After him, some presidents connected to those agencies who were actually near JFK's assassination somehow still claimed to have no idea where they were in one of America's most easily answered "Where were you at that moment?" days. Stay safe
I never really thought of this link until "SADS" became an actual term during covid. They didn't link it to vaccination directly, but "suddenly" adults started having an adult version of SIDS for absolutely no reason? What was new that might have caused that suddenly?
This 1000 times this. Literally the entire government, because there is nothing in any law, not Constitution, Amendment, Bill, Code, Statute, NOTHING that even remotely says anything about a judge being able to usurt the Executive Branch's power.
If allowed to happen, that means any other made-up usurped power is just as OK. Any random judge can control Congress as well. And since nothing even says it has to be a judge, so could a random toddler anywhere. Or you. Or angsty teenage dropout. Anyone, anywhere, full control of all government simply because a few corrupt judges decided random people get that power without any basis for their claim. Literally nothing makes these insurrections legal, which is why they should continue to be ignored.
The fact that this isn't blowing up right now as the full on Constitutional Crisis and/or Insurrection it actually is means no one wants to push the issue. One side knows their entire story pops as soon as anyone with a pulse looks at it, and the other side probably want to maximize the bubble burst potential in both size and timing.
Clear conflicts of interests have been "OK" for Harvard judges. Probably the biggest example of a Harvard grad not getting in trouble when he failed to recuse himself from a case with clear conflicts of interest is Justice Thomas. Thomas refused to recuse from every Monsanto case he was presented, despite being a Monsanto employee. You can't really get more clear cut conflict of interest than a public money trail between judge and one party the judge is presiding over.
Even if AIDS as Megyn is saying is an actual symptom, "mass die off" isn't a thing... at least not with HIV caused AIDS. Constant medication can now hold viral loads so low they are undetectable and the illness can't be easily passed. Something like that - fatal if not constantly medicated and absolutely without symptoms when medicine payments are fully up to date - is actually the pharma industry's holy grail. As Goldman said while Covid was still under development: "Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" Its certainly less sustainable than patients who will never be cured but will die if they aren't your customer.
When a confirmed fascist media censor takes down something, you know with certainty the thing they are trying to censor is knowledge you should be aware of. They did this over covid confirming that they do it explicitly to try and kill more people and stop people from knowing how to survive and thrive, so their goal in takedowns is to cause death... therefore the info they fear does the opposite.