I think it's important that I start this post by saying I am not anyone special. My posts here could be considered anywhere from low to middle effort. Many anons here put me to shame with their high effort and insightful posts. I am fortunate to be a member of this community, and I appreciate anyone putting in effort. I recently made a meme that called out datefagging and I want to clarify why I made it.

When you hover over the "Create A Post" button, you will see Q Post #1786...

"You are now mainstream. Handle w/ care. The Great Awakening. WWG1WGA!"

How appropriate that just before we make a post here, we get a reminder of the responsibility that we carry as anons. "We are the public face of Q". When we make a post or comment here, it can end up reflecting on the whole movement. Should this be the case? No, we are not Q. We are anons. But to the average normie influenced by MSM, we may as well all be "Qanon".

What is datefagging? It is a prediction of certain events unfolding at a certain date and/or time based often on "decodes" of Q posts or other outside sources. IMO there are different degrees of datefagging.

Low level: Example "Hey, this upcoming delta points to "Gold shall destroy the Fed". Gold has been in the news lately. Will we see big habbenings with gold in the upcoming days?"

Mid-Level: Example "Timestamp on this POTUS tweet lines up with this Q post which means something big could be habbening on this day. Keep your eyes peeled for info related to this subject (see something, say something etc.)"

High-Level: "I have decoded comms that indicate a major event will be habbening on this specific date." This event could cause death, destruction and could lead to fear and or panic from people who see this decode and believe it to be true/authentic.

Low and Mid-Level datefagging has little impact other than to bring it to the attention of fellow anons and perhaps expand on these educated guesses through further digging. High-level datefagging however, can lead to much more serious consequences and therefore should probably come with extra high-quality sauce. These high-level posts can also damage the credibility of the OP or possibly the site as a whole when/if these types of posts/comments get shoved into the mainstream spotlight.

I will reference the third to last Q Post #4964...

"Be aware of false prophets. I am not a prophet. You are not a prophet. We are not prophets. Focus on the mission. Q"

prophet noun proph·​et ˈprä-fət Synonyms of prophet 1 : one who utters divinely inspired revelations: such as a often capitalized : the writer of one of the prophetic books of the Bible b capitalized : one regarded by a group of followers as the final authoritative revealer of God's will Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah 2 : one gifted with more than ordinary spiritual and moral insight especially : an inspired poet 3 : one who foretells future events : predictor

Does this mean I think we should not attempt to warn others if we feel we have valuable insights or information? No. It simply means we should make every effort to provide as much detail as possible on how we reached these conclusions and support our claims with extra sauce.

I will now get off my soap box and happily sign off with this final Q post #3683...

"We are all equal in this fight. No one person is above another. "Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes." God bless you. United We Stand. Q"