I understand that timing is everything. Declass, if it is to happen, must be according to the Plan.
I am concerned that people dying, retiring, getting accused of things by their Boards are "easy" ways out.
Q said no deals. Did the Pope escape? Did Scwaub? Epstein? Various politicians retiring?
Winning by attrition, whether forced or not, is not good enough.
I want the truth out there about eerything. And the longer we wait to see it, the greter the division in the US. Furthermore, the slow drip method is desensitizing people to the horror of the facts. Take the Nazi/Hitler/Argentina thing that got some airtime recently... no one gave a shit!!!
Things better speed up.
So do you think they're actually going to be hanged, for our viewing pleasure?
Or is it just some vague idea that you have, while the rational part of your brain processes the reality of our judicial system, with years or even decades of prosecution, and then appeal after appeal from death row, and in the rare occasion that someone is actually put to death, it will most likely be via lethal injection, with only the customary group of people there to view it, and not as some huge public spectacle?
Or are we just going to do away with all that pesky due process nonsense?
I think due process... military tribunals... hangings.
Treason at the highest level--and that should be a public hanging.
I guess I am just very selfish in the end. I play by the rules. I am a sinner, but not a law-breaker. I can't even walk out with a bottle of gatorade that I forgot to get out of the cart and nobody saw. I want those who have taken advantage of the system, put others in danger, hurt or killed others, etc. for their own gain to pay the price. That, to me, is justice--when I (and every other law-abiding citizen)--is able to point at the hanging body and say, "They got what they deserved."
Yeah, "treason" gets thrown around a lot here. People basically think anything illegal going on that has a political aspect to it is treason. It's not. And unless the person accused is in the military or is a non-citizen enemy combatant, there would be no military tribunal for them.
Not only that, but the last time someone was executed for treason in the US (by hanging or any other form) was in 1862.
Treason convictions in the US are extremely rare. In the entire history of the United States, there has only been around 40 people tried for treason, and very few of them were even convicted.
I wish I knew where this idea that we were suddenly going to start hanging thousands of people for treason (as a public sideshow, apparently) even came from.
Did it come directly from a Q drop, or just from the imagination of some random Anon?
Not sure where the idea came from. But "high treason" has been discussed quite a bit for some big names.
Yeah, people like saying "high treason". But they typically have zero idea as to what that term means.
But it sure does sound impressive, doesn't it?