Hmm... It's a Friday and potus is Boarding AF1...
Did anyone notice the Q1265 April 25 Delta "+++ ++ +"
And the Q1007 [:57] QClock Delta "+ ++ +++" ???
April 25 Delta
"We knew this day would come."
u/#q1265
Today is [:57] on the QClock
So is Q1007 April 03, 2018 ⬇️
u/#q1007
Dan Scavino posted a clip this morning of Trump boarding AF1 at 6:35am.
u/#q35
The Kash Tweet: (Judge #1)
Here's the deleted Kash Patel tweet from just a bit ago announcing the arrest of a Federal Judge in less than 24hrs... Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan arrested on obstruction charges... We just passed the first [1-99] Days of Trumps 2nd Term.
The Dan Bongino tweet (2nd Fed Judge) discussed here:
From Benny Johnson: The FBI is arresting corrupt judges shielding illegal gang members.
Another source (on X) if you don't like Benny Johnson:
Judge who harbored Tren de Aragua terrorist just put in handcuffs (video).
Dan Scavino posted this morning at 6:35
(See Q35 above.)
Dan Scavino - Happening Now! President Trump and First Lady Melania arrive at Joint Base Andrews to board Air Force One
EDIT:
Just noticed something else interesting…
Today's [:57] QClock Delta Q1007 (referenced above):
"Bunker.
Forest.
Blue.
- ++ +++ APRIL SHOWERS."
B F B = 2 6 2
Q262 posted Dec 05, 2017 is tomorrow [:58] on the QClock.
On Q262...
"RED RED stringer 25th."
Hussein RED video 27th (response).
Hussein in Asia on 28th post stringer."
25th is today.
27th is... some kind of "response" from the bad guys??
Q says in that post "More than one meaning."
Idk... what do you guys think?
Thank you for calling this out. I hope this helps...
I'm not sure if you're asking this sarcastically or you really don't see how I arrived at 262...
B = 2
F = 6
B = 2
There really are people that do not get simple things like that above ⬆️.
Things that, in my mind, are plainly obvious.
It is exactly for that reason that I sometimes end a post with 5:5? Or Get it?
I am no prophet, and certainly not the highest IQ on GAW.
It's impossible to be an Anon not be a coincidence Noticer. Some notice coincidences that aren't even there, and others wouldn't recognize a coincidence if it was right on their forehead. (Not talking about you.)
Q said "on the clock" several times, but interestingly, only in the month of April as far as I've seen.
It's obvious to me and others that the QClock is legit based on an overwhelming preponderance of the evidence.
I think the simple answer as to why it even exists is that, for certain things, plausible deniability must be maintained. Q directly told us as much.
I've explained how the Qclock works before here so if you want to learn, you can check my post history. I think others have done a much better job at explaining it than I have.
It's really interesting and not that complicated as it looks.
I think you might like it. But you have to want to learn it.
I've done Qclock posts that have gotten sticky, over 150+ likes blah blah so I'm not the only one that believes in it.
Back in the day it was widely understood by anons that it was legit. Most people here were not following Q daily.
After so many Qclock deltas I've seen hit right on the nose, I would say it's approaching "Statistically impossible."
That may not be enough for some, but it's enough for me and many others here.
If you take the time and learn how the clock works, which is beyond the scope of this comment, it will be plainly obvious how the two are ostensibly linked.
Post dates continuously circle the clock. In a spiral. Kind of like Sun rays. With 60 rays/minutes extending outward.
How did judges have anything to do with Q262, I have no idea. And I have no idea what's gonna happen. And maybe we're coming up on the 10 days, or maybe we're not.
We're all just sharing information here.
EDIT: Help me so I can help you guys
If someone can show me how to post multiple pictures in a text thread and not just links that people have to click on, I will spend hours on a dedicated post methodically explaining once and for all exactly how the Qclock works and give numerous examples of statistically impossible examples of it in action that way more of us can be on the same page. I just need to be taught how to do* pictures in a text thread, and not just a link to a picture because with this topic specifically, you need to be able to read my words and then look at the graphic at the same time.
This will be a powerful reference tool for everyone here because the Qclock really is amazing and it can be learned in minutes with a proper, detailed post.
Some notice coincidences that aren't even there, and others wouldn't recognize a coincidence if it was right on their forehead.... That made me smile!😊
Can't upvote this enough
If the Q clock dates had the year included, that would be a massive win
Maybe I could follow it then
Maybe :)
I wish I could help with this. I can’t even figure out how to highlight text in green, like you do! My son is a whiz at this stuff. He’s supposed to be over this weekend. I’ll ask him to guide you in an informative DM.
Put * on either side of the text to highlight green.
Put ** on either side of the test for black.
Thank you, fren!
You are welcome!
*** for big green ;)
Yes I was being sarcastic in regards to your Q#262 decode. I'm pointing out that it seems like your decoding seems rather arbitrary specifically on points 3 and 4. I didn't ask for an explanation on the Q clock, I'm familiar with it. I asked if Q ever directly confirmed the Q clock as authentic/accurate. Answer: No
I asked why the Q clock is not listed as a resource on the side bar. These two questions were meant to challenge the veracity of the Q clock. We clearly have different opinions on that.
"It's obvious to me and others that the QClock is legit based on an overwhelming preponderance of the evidence."
That's not evidence, it's opinion. Link the source of the Q clock you are using. Otherwise there is no way to track consistency of where the sequence of posts fall on the "clock" and therefore your overall consistency of decodes. I've been following Q from the beginning. I recall the differing opinions on the accuracy of the Q clock when it first came out. Again, I have seen different versions of the clock. For example, some start winding at :60, some at :57. That would skew where the posts fall.
"After so many Qclock deltas I've seen hit right on the nose, I would say it's approaching "Statistically impossible.""
Ok, what about the ones that you yourself or anyone else have gotten wrong? If the Q clock is so easy to follow and accurate, why the misses? (Not just 1 or 2, many.)
"It's impossible to be an Anon not be a coincidence Noticer. Some notice coincidences that aren't even there"
If your methods of "decoding" are incredibly broad, you can find coincidences in everything." The saying "Be open minded, but not so open minded that your brain falls out." seems applicable.
And my final question was what you thought it all meant.Your answer seems to be, " I don't know for sure." and "I see coincidences". 🤷♂️
The correct Qclock starts on 12/7/17 @ [00]
If you doubt the clocks veracity, that's fine.
I'm not here to convince you.
You can explain things to people, but you cannot understand it for them.
u/#q370
I agree. Despite my best efforts to explain the flaws in your arbitrary decodes, you still don't seem to understand 😁.
True