Fair point. However it might be good information. It could also be disinformation I see the need for 72 hours rule. Ugh sometimes it reminds me of the Abbot and Costello. lol
Don't discount the Marx brothers. I mean, Why a duck? hehe.
Good information vs bad information: the first way to begin vetting that is to actually read it through and see if it makes sense. There have been plenty of accusations about Pompeo, including some high profile ones by Tucker Carlson. But the accounts here are blatantly saying "According to James O'Keefe...' when there is zero basis for that statement offered.
That's a red flag, regardless of whether Pompeo was involved or not.
It's important to distinguish between the issues, and parse how and in what way different information is being offered, or pushed.
And yet, who is asserting that Pompeo was involved? Not Shellenberger, and not Okeefe.
Its the X account who makes this claim.
Fair point. However it might be good information. It could also be disinformation I see the need for 72 hours rule. Ugh sometimes it reminds me of the Abbot and Costello. lol
Don't discount the Marx brothers. I mean, Why a duck? hehe.
Good information vs bad information: the first way to begin vetting that is to actually read it through and see if it makes sense. There have been plenty of accusations about Pompeo, including some high profile ones by Tucker Carlson. But the accounts here are blatantly saying "According to James O'Keefe...' when there is zero basis for that statement offered.
That's a red flag, regardless of whether Pompeo was involved or not.
It's important to distinguish between the issues, and parse how and in what way different information is being offered, or pushed.
I forgot about the Marx brothers I loved those guys as a kid good one 😃