The guy who was majorly redpilled about Ukraine, and who gave the explosive speech in EU parliament.
He is blue pilled in many areas, including Trump tariffs.
However, taking this clip out of context and calling him a supporter of globalism (as implied here) is actually misrepresenting him. There are many things you can criticise him for, but he has claified where he stands on Globalism and Anons owe it to themselves to dig a little bit deeper when they see these kinds of narrative painting.
Esp, with the existance of Grok, doing this kind of research literally takes less than a few minutes.
I would really love GAW to become the one place where people bring these kinds of posts but also add their own digs upon which other Anons can build.
For me, whenever I see this kind of targetting of someone by a so called redpill channel, first question I ask is "What has the target recently beein in the news for? Has he been over the target about something?".
What he said regarding, "We need government at ALL LEVELS" and a UN "World Government" - was pretty unambiguous.
How will he backpedal that one I wonder?
Clearly, I'm not a professional journalist. I don't have unlimited time to play that role because I'm not getting gibs from the gummint to feed my family.
This is what the man said. I didn't study everything the man said before... because I have a life...in the real physical world.
I don't use Grok or any AI - You want to do all that, have at it. I mean, it's not like ai is ever biased or anything... It's ALWAYS spot on. 🙄
I guess we mere mortals should just be a wall flower and not participate in the proverbial conversation because it doesn't meet "elite standards" and run through a machine created by the empire then, right?
There are many kinds of psyops. The common ones are
Tell the wrong things for the wrong reasons (Classic Dems)
Tell the right things for the wrong reasons (Classic RINOs)
Tell the wrong things for the right reasons (Q misdirections)
But this one falls under the "Paint a clown asset with the wrong color to increase his credibility"
Firstly, just by looking at him, this clip seems to be from long ago. He has over the years made his position clear - he likes a reformed UN with similar to original charter to act as a way for countries to come together and resolve issues.
He also has been an "anti-establishment" figure. So when you scratch just the surface him being a Globalist is easily "debunkable".
But why? Its by design.
His true color is not Globalism, but China centric world order (which he keeps calling multipolar world order). He has cleverly cloaked this as "Anti-Biden, Anti-Deep State" for a long time now. But the time is coming to unleash him as a China shill.
These recent videos of him from last couple days will explain this psyop:
The guy who was majorly redpilled about Ukraine, and who gave the explosive speech in EU parliament.
He is blue pilled in many areas, including Trump tariffs.
However, taking this clip out of context and calling him a supporter of globalism (as implied here) is actually misrepresenting him. There are many things you can criticise him for, but he has claified where he stands on Globalism and Anons owe it to themselves to dig a little bit deeper when they see these kinds of narrative painting.
Esp, with the existance of Grok, doing this kind of research literally takes less than a few minutes.
I would really love GAW to become the one place where people bring these kinds of posts but also add their own digs upon which other Anons can build.
For me, whenever I see this kind of targetting of someone by a so called redpill channel, first question I ask is "What has the target recently beein in the news for? Has he been over the target about something?".
I dunno BB.
What he said regarding, "We need government at ALL LEVELS" and a UN "World Government" - was pretty unambiguous.
How will he backpedal that one I wonder?
Clearly, I'm not a professional journalist. I don't have unlimited time to play that role because I'm not getting gibs from the gummint to feed my family.
This is what the man said. I didn't study everything the man said before... because I have a life...in the real physical world.
I don't use Grok or any AI - You want to do all that, have at it. I mean, it's not like ai is ever biased or anything... It's ALWAYS spot on. 🙄
I guess we mere mortals should just be a wall flower and not participate in the proverbial conversation because it doesn't meet "elite standards" and run through a machine created by the empire then, right?
Give me a freaking break...
There are many kinds of psyops. The common ones are
Tell the wrong things for the wrong reasons (Classic Dems)
Tell the right things for the wrong reasons (Classic RINOs)
Tell the wrong things for the right reasons (Q misdirections)
But this one falls under the "Paint a clown asset with the wrong color to increase his credibility"
Firstly, just by looking at him, this clip seems to be from long ago. He has over the years made his position clear - he likes a reformed UN with similar to original charter to act as a way for countries to come together and resolve issues.
He also has been an "anti-establishment" figure. So when you scratch just the surface him being a Globalist is easily "debunkable".
But why? Its by design.
His true color is not Globalism, but China centric world order (which he keeps calling multipolar world order). He has cleverly cloaked this as "Anti-Biden, Anti-Deep State" for a long time now. But the time is coming to unleash him as a China shill.
These recent videos of him from last couple days will explain this psyop:
https://youtu.be/qcTLAX8hF7I?si=nWIsALc-oOw2nAPf
https://youtu.be/nJ10pXBxFyk?si=wfsEK4S4lN4K4qkJ
And by spreading easily "debunkable" claims against him, we will make him even more credible and thats the psyop.