Perhaps so, but it wasn't exactly free though was it? Russia finally paid off their debt in 2006, I believe.
Same with Britain, but we also had to agree to give up what was left of the Empire and be America's lapdog into perpetuity (Iraq and Ukraine being prime examples).
I would never downplay the sacrifice made by Russians, not just in defeating Nazis, but also defeating Napolean and helping US is so many crucial points, and in general defending the world against Cabal's evil schemes.
I am simply making the point that in fact, WW2 would not have ended without USA entering the war and providing both the military and the financial support. I wouldn't phrase it as "single-handedly defeated the Nazis" and even Trump did not claim that in his Victory day announcement (I am assuming this post was triggered by the coverage of that speech), but without US it would not have been possible.
Independently of the Russian question, I believe Napoleon took a stand against the cabal, and handed the Louisiana Purchase to the U.S.A. to help us against the cabal when his chances grew slimmer.
I wouldn't be too surprised if Alaska was gifted to the USA by the czar for the same reasons.
I knew a smart anon will debate me on Napoleon and hence i chose my words carefully - “against Cabal's evil schemes” because i don’t know if Napoleon tried to rate a stand against the Cabal from the beginning or whether he was a Cabal puppet or whether he started off as a puppet and turned against his masters like so many others in history.
Napolean is a mystery but one thing is for sure. He plunged the European countries into debt to English bankers and he tried hard to defeat Russians - Cabals eternal wet dreams. So as far as the results of his actions he is part of Cabal’s evil schemes
started off as a puppet and turned against his masters like so many others in history.
That's my bet. The way anyone rises to prominence is by playing ball with them. But the closer they get, the more they realize it's the road to evil. And some resist with varying degrees of success, like Lincoln, Napoleon, Kennedy, Diana, or Reagan.
I would say Otto von Hindenburg was another, but his sincere opposition leading a real movement got him replaced by Hitler, a puppet who pretended to oppose the cabal but instead helped them double down on their killing. Difficult to tease out the truth of an individual's true motivations when time gets in the way, but that's my hunch on Napoleon.
Particularly in your belief that my post was triggered by Trump's statement that the US did more to defeat Nazi Germany than the rest of the allies combined. I can't help wondering if he actually believes what he said.
What I find most difficult to reconcile is the amount of Russiaphobia in the 'Collect West' when the WWII allies should ALL be coming together to celebrate defeating the Nazi scum.
Btw the greatest achievement of Hitler and Stalin combined was that together they eliminated more Nazis and Commie at the same time than any other event.
I kinda think Molotov-Ribbontrop pact was really aimed at this
I’m with you B_B! So, was Hitler trying to take out the Nazis and got blamed for being one of them because he was in the losing side of WW2? I’m trying to make sense of all the deception around WW2….
I thought so. I’d urge you to relisten to the clip again. He chose his words very carefully and he gave a very nice shoutout to Russians. He never used the phrase “single handedly” nor did he imply it in any way.
"...we did more than any other Country, by far, in producing a victorious result on World War II." and "We won two World Wars, but we never took credit for it..."
I think that DJT has been watching too many Audi Murphy films.
Perhaps so, but it wasn't exactly free though was it? Russia finally paid off their debt in 2006, I believe.
Same with Britain, but we also had to agree to give up what was left of the Empire and be America's lapdog into perpetuity (Iraq and Ukraine being prime examples).
I would never downplay the sacrifice made by Russians, not just in defeating Nazis, but also defeating Napolean and helping US is so many crucial points, and in general defending the world against Cabal's evil schemes.
I am simply making the point that in fact, WW2 would not have ended without USA entering the war and providing both the military and the financial support. I wouldn't phrase it as "single-handedly defeated the Nazis" and even Trump did not claim that in his Victory day announcement (I am assuming this post was triggered by the coverage of that speech), but without US it would not have been possible.
Independently of the Russian question, I believe Napoleon took a stand against the cabal, and handed the Louisiana Purchase to the U.S.A. to help us against the cabal when his chances grew slimmer.
I wouldn't be too surprised if Alaska was gifted to the USA by the czar for the same reasons.
I knew a smart anon will debate me on Napoleon and hence i chose my words carefully - “against Cabal's evil schemes” because i don’t know if Napoleon tried to rate a stand against the Cabal from the beginning or whether he was a Cabal puppet or whether he started off as a puppet and turned against his masters like so many others in history.
Napolean is a mystery but one thing is for sure. He plunged the European countries into debt to English bankers and he tried hard to defeat Russians - Cabals eternal wet dreams. So as far as the results of his actions he is part of Cabal’s evil schemes
That's my bet. The way anyone rises to prominence is by playing ball with them. But the closer they get, the more they realize it's the road to evil. And some resist with varying degrees of success, like Lincoln, Napoleon, Kennedy, Diana, or Reagan.
I would say Otto von Hindenburg was another, but his sincere opposition leading a real movement got him replaced by Hitler, a puppet who pretended to oppose the cabal but instead helped them double down on their killing. Difficult to tease out the truth of an individual's true motivations when time gets in the way, but that's my hunch on Napoleon.
I agree to a certain extent.
Particularly in your belief that my post was triggered by Trump's statement that the US did more to defeat Nazi Germany than the rest of the allies combined. I can't help wondering if he actually believes what he said.
What I find most difficult to reconcile is the amount of Russiaphobia in the 'Collect West' when the WWII allies should ALL be coming together to celebrate defeating the Nazi scum.
Btw the greatest achievement of Hitler and Stalin combined was that together they eliminated more Nazis and Commie at the same time than any other event.
I kinda think Molotov-Ribbontrop pact was really aimed at this
I’m with you B_B! So, was Hitler trying to take out the Nazis and got blamed for being one of them because he was in the losing side of WW2? I’m trying to make sense of all the deception around WW2….
I thought so. I’d urge you to relisten to the clip again. He chose his words very carefully and he gave a very nice shoutout to Russians. He never used the phrase “single handedly” nor did he imply it in any way.
See the following extracts from TS:
"...we did more than any other Country, by far, in producing a victorious result on World War II." and "We won two World Wars, but we never took credit for it..."
I think that DJT has been watching too many Audi Murphy films.