Predictive programming.
They were not 'warning us' of what the bad guys want to do to get us wake up to it.
They were part of the system - and are revealing what the deep state/cabal is doing and wants to do - and showing mocking that we can do nothing to stop it.
They were also producers on V for Vendetta - you know - that little movie about a government conspiracy to infect their own people with a bioweapon to justify lockdowns and tyrannical control and censorship? back in 2005.
it is all presented as fiction to lull people into sleep thinking that it can never happen for real, and to 'justify' their actions so they dont get bad karma or something. Because by not stopping it they have no penalty for actually doing it.
as the line goes from the second movie with the 'Architect' (i.e masonic) 'the problem is choice, the first matrix failed, and it was revealed that people had to choose their prison - even at a 'near unconscious level'- - that is the same exact principle.
I believe with the predictive programming they are complying with contract law - informed consent. They inform us through fiction so that we don't object. When we don't respond, that is implied consent. But it's fraudulent, really. Information conveyed through fiction is not meant to be received as truth. So the contract is void, once we figure out the scam.
Predictive programming. They were not 'warning us' of what the bad guys want to do to get us wake up to it.
They were part of the system - and are revealing what the deep state/cabal is doing and wants to do - and showing mocking that we can do nothing to stop it.
They were also producers on V for Vendetta - you know - that little movie about a government conspiracy to infect their own people with a bioweapon to justify lockdowns and tyrannical control and censorship? back in 2005.
as the line goes from the second movie with the 'Architect' (i.e masonic) 'the problem is choice, the first matrix failed, and it was revealed that people had to choose their prison - even at a 'near unconscious level'- - that is the same exact principle.
I believe with the predictive programming they are complying with contract law - informed consent. They inform us through fiction so that we don't object. When we don't respond, that is implied consent. But it's fraudulent, really. Information conveyed through fiction is not meant to be received as truth. So the contract is void, once we figure out the scam.