Hmmmm... OK. This is both a linguistic issue and an ontological (?) issue.
The terminology you're using has specific meanings for you (and the collective that uses it in this way). Plus, you appear to be conceiving as the world of consisting of either 'normies' (definition) and 'anons' (definition).
I don't quite see it like that, and this is how we've encountered some disagreement in the premise that "only the anons are aware that we live in the Matrix".
When you have linguistic differences (using language in different ways, aka using what we might call different 'dialects', where certain terms have different meanings) and ontological differences (differences in the way reality or actual being is interpreted and understood), you are bound to encounter apparent 'disagreements'.
More often than not, there will be overlapping areas where commonality of thought finds agreement. For example, although we may have somewhat different definitions, I think we both agree in large part about the idea of 'the matrix'. Aka, a false, generated reality largely conceptual in nature. (?)
But I think I understand better your definitions and conceptual framework now, so I can understand, I think, why you say "only the anons are aware of it". I don't quite see it that way, but that's OK. Merely different angles on perception of the reality.
(But just to give an example, I have a close associate who would by and large agree that the majority of the population are living in an illusion and matrix, but he is by no means anon or has ever been anywhere in anondom on the net. So, I do not consider him 'anon').
Q's input has given rise to a broad and diverse conceptualization of what exactly 'the matrix is, ie the fake idea or reality psypopped on the world by the Cabal and political satanists. But that conceptualization is by no means homogeneous, nor is it the only one.
For example, a serious Buddhist looks at the world and how people interact with it and conceives most of it to be a form of what we might call the Matrix. Illusion. Misconceived grasp of the underlying reality. But his view of 'the Matrix' will differ significantly from what anons and Q patriots conceive as the Matrix.
Indeed. Yet, I am still confident in my claim that it is not 'only anons' who recognize that we live in a form of Matrix.
Hmmmm... OK. This is both a linguistic issue and an ontological (?) issue.
The terminology you're using has specific meanings for you (and the collective that uses it in this way). Plus, you appear to be conceiving as the world of consisting of either 'normies' (definition) and 'anons' (definition).
I don't quite see it like that, and this is how we've encountered some disagreement in the premise that "only the anons are aware that we live in the Matrix".
When you have linguistic differences (using language in different ways, aka using what we might call different 'dialects', where certain terms have different meanings) and ontological differences (differences in the way reality or actual being is interpreted and understood), you are bound to encounter apparent 'disagreements'.
More often than not, there will be overlapping areas where commonality of thought finds agreement. For example, although we may have somewhat different definitions, I think we both agree in large part about the idea of 'the matrix'. Aka, a false, generated reality largely conceptual in nature. (?)
But I think I understand better your definitions and conceptual framework now, so I can understand, I think, why you say "only the anons are aware of it". I don't quite see it that way, but that's OK. Merely different angles on perception of the reality.
(But just to give an example, I have a close associate who would by and large agree that the majority of the population are living in an illusion and matrix, but he is by no means anon or has ever been anywhere in anondom on the net. So, I do not consider him 'anon').
Q's input has given rise to a broad and diverse conceptualization of what exactly 'the matrix is, ie the fake idea or reality psypopped on the world by the Cabal and political satanists. But that conceptualization is by no means homogeneous, nor is it the only one.
For example, a serious Buddhist looks at the world and how people interact with it and conceives most of it to be a form of what we might call the Matrix. Illusion. Misconceived grasp of the underlying reality. But his view of 'the Matrix' will differ significantly from what anons and Q patriots conceive as the Matrix.
I guess that's what I mean.