If you look at the US budget pie chart, you will see that biggest sectors are Medicaid and Social Security. These two make up more than a whopping 50%.
One can only imagine how much of this end up in the Cabal pockets. I am thinking probably upwards of 80%.
Then comes Military and Interest on US debt.
There is absolutely no way we can ever hope for a balanced budget without gutting out all the Cabal money from these top two items and why the Dems scream their heads off at the mere mention of these top two items.
Everything else is chump change but actually runs the rest of the federal government.
π
Probably spent hours on MS Paint creating that pretty background, but couldn't take 2 seconds to fix the markdown syntax meant to emphasize "THAT'S".
I ran the question about what is being cut from Medicaid through Grok.
This is what I got in return:
"The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," proposing significant changes to Medicaid. These changes are projected to reduce federal Medicaid spending by approximately $625 billion to $880 billion over the next decade, potentially resulting in millions losing coverage.
Key Proposed Changes to Medicaid:
Work Requirements: Able-bodied adults aged 19β64 would need to complete 80 hours per month of work, education, or community service to qualify for Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office estimates this could lead to 8.6 million people losing coverage by 2034.
Increased Eligibility Verification: States would be required to verify Medicaid eligibility more frequently, adding administrative burdens that could result in eligible individuals losing coverage due to procedural issues.
Reduced Federal Support for Certain Populations: The bill proposes cutting federal Medicaid funding to states that provide coverage to undocumented immigrants, potentially affecting states like California.
Ban on Gender-Affirming Care: Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) would be prohibited from covering gender-affirming treatments for individuals of all ages.
Cost Shifting to States: States would bear increased financial responsibility for Medicaid, potentially leading to service reductions or increased state taxes to cover the shortfall.
These proposed changes are part of a broader legislative package that also includes tax reforms and spending adjustments. The bill now moves to the Senate, where it may undergo further revisions."
I looked into the bill itself to see if this was accurate and by what I can tell, it is.
So, yes, a good part of the budget cuts is due to cutting funding to states that provide coverage to illegals, like California. The idea is that it would make California stop covering illegals.
The bill doesn't automatically cut funding to illegals. It is trying to shift that responsibility to the states that provide coverage to illegals. It presumes that the state will cut funding to illegals.
But when has California ever done the right thing in this matter? They'd more likely go find all the Trump supporters on Medicaid and cut them instead of cutting illegals.
I'm not saying that I am opposed to cutting Medicaid to illegals or to able bodied Americans who are taking advantage of the system.
My point is that the bill presumes that states will cut illegals from Medicaid. It does not guarantee that. And it also obviously cuts Medicaid from American citizens as well. Both of which obviously contradict what President Trump said about Medicaid not being touched.
Again, I'm not arguing against the cuts. So don't start coming at me about that.
I'm saying that the claim you are making is not correct. So please don't spread things like this because it only makes us look ignorant when we try to use it on liberals who have taken the time and effort to research the matter.
We are supposed to be an "elite message board", after all. We can't let liberals beat us at that. So please put a little more effort in your "research" than just believing whatever Joe Blow sticks up on X or various other social media sites. No matter how pretty they make it.
I'd also like to gently remind people that this is still just a bill. It has not passed the Senate yet. It is not yet a law. Today, it is still just a bill.
For those Anons who never had the pleasure of growing up with this masterpiece:
If you look at the US budget pie chart, you will see that biggest sectors are Medicaid and Social Security. These two make up more than a whopping 50%.
One can only imagine how much of this end up in the Cabal pockets. I am thinking probably upwards of 80%.
Then comes Military and Interest on US debt.
There is absolutely no way we can ever hope for a balanced budget without gutting out all the Cabal money from these top two items and why the Dems scream their heads off at the mere mention of these top two items.
Everything else is chump change but actually runs the rest of the federal government.
Hoorah.
Love those fb boomer memes π
π Probably spent hours on MS Paint creating that pretty background, but couldn't take 2 seconds to fix the markdown syntax meant to emphasize "THAT'S".
Kek.
Well, FB has these big boxes with backgrounds you can choose from, so whoever made that post didn't have to do any art
I ran the question about what is being cut from Medicaid through Grok.
This is what I got in return:
"The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," proposing significant changes to Medicaid. These changes are projected to reduce federal Medicaid spending by approximately $625 billion to $880 billion over the next decade, potentially resulting in millions losing coverage.
Key Proposed Changes to Medicaid:
Work Requirements: Able-bodied adults aged 19β64 would need to complete 80 hours per month of work, education, or community service to qualify for Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office estimates this could lead to 8.6 million people losing coverage by 2034.
Increased Eligibility Verification: States would be required to verify Medicaid eligibility more frequently, adding administrative burdens that could result in eligible individuals losing coverage due to procedural issues.
Reduced Federal Support for Certain Populations: The bill proposes cutting federal Medicaid funding to states that provide coverage to undocumented immigrants, potentially affecting states like California.
Ban on Gender-Affirming Care: Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) would be prohibited from covering gender-affirming treatments for individuals of all ages.
Cost Shifting to States: States would bear increased financial responsibility for Medicaid, potentially leading to service reductions or increased state taxes to cover the shortfall.
These proposed changes are part of a broader legislative package that also includes tax reforms and spending adjustments. The bill now moves to the Senate, where it may undergo further revisions."
I looked into the bill itself to see if this was accurate and by what I can tell, it is.
So, yes, a good part of the budget cuts is due to cutting funding to states that provide coverage to illegals, like California. The idea is that it would make California stop covering illegals.
The bill doesn't automatically cut funding to illegals. It is trying to shift that responsibility to the states that provide coverage to illegals. It presumes that the state will cut funding to illegals.
But when has California ever done the right thing in this matter? They'd more likely go find all the Trump supporters on Medicaid and cut them instead of cutting illegals.
I'm not saying that I am opposed to cutting Medicaid to illegals or to able bodied Americans who are taking advantage of the system.
My point is that the bill presumes that states will cut illegals from Medicaid. It does not guarantee that. And it also obviously cuts Medicaid from American citizens as well. Both of which obviously contradict what President Trump said about Medicaid not being touched.
Again, I'm not arguing against the cuts. So don't start coming at me about that.
I'm saying that the claim you are making is not correct. So please don't spread things like this because it only makes us look ignorant when we try to use it on liberals who have taken the time and effort to research the matter.
We are supposed to be an "elite message board", after all. We can't let liberals beat us at that. So please put a little more effort in your "research" than just believing whatever Joe Blow sticks up on X or various other social media sites. No matter how pretty they make it.
I'd also like to gently remind people that this is still just a bill. It has not passed the Senate yet. It is not yet a law. Today, it is still just a bill.
For those Anons who never had the pleasure of growing up with this masterpiece:
https://youtu.be/ax6PDAjjbgs?si=wxluLrIlJXf99efY
Great informative post. I still think the bill is a good idea, and states (like mine) should be penalized for encouraging invasion by foreigners.
I agree. And thank you.
Well it is also targeting able bodied Americans that donβt want to work