The NASB 1995 translation is a perverted bible translation! See my examples of perversion document. This document references the NASB version not the NASB 1995 specifically but most of the examples are true for the NASB 1995 version as well with John 3:16 being an exception.
For me, the litmus test is Colossians 1:14
in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. (NASB 1995)
versus
In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: (KJV)
Why would a bible translator remove "through his blood"?
Why would they remove "omnipotent", "Godhead", "sodomite" (1 reference vs 5 in the KJV), "Holy Ghost", "Jesus Christ" (appears only 236 times vs 258 times in KJV) and hell (15 times vs 54 times in KJV).
CONCLUSIONS:
NASB 1995 does not want redemption through the blood of Jesus. It promotes a bloodless salvation!
It wants you to believe that Joseph is the father of Jesus (Luke 2:33)
It undermines the Diety of the Lord throughout by eliminating references to "Jesus Christ"
It attempts to soften the message by eliminating references to "hell"
It tries to obfuscate that sodomy is sin by removing 4 of the 5 occurrences of the word sodomite.
NASB 1995 is better. more accurate and updated language.
the accuracy is the one biiiiiggest reason to buy NASB 1995. we should all strive 2 seek ACCURACY in our daily life..... policy of TRUTH
The NASB 1995 translation is a perverted bible translation! See my examples of perversion document. This document references the NASB version not the NASB 1995 specifically but most of the examples are true for the NASB 1995 version as well with John 3:16 being an exception.
For me, the litmus test is Colossians 1:14
versus
Why would a bible translator remove "through his blood"? Why would they remove "omnipotent", "Godhead", "sodomite" (1 reference vs 5 in the KJV), "Holy Ghost", "Jesus Christ" (appears only 236 times vs 258 times in KJV) and hell (15 times vs 54 times in KJV).
CONCLUSIONS: