I think we already have mass surveillance being conducted by the 3 letter agencies.
What we have on the financial side of the Government is deliberate incompetence to enable fraud.
Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but it seems like this Palantir deal is to help clean up the fraud and money laundering by establishing one centralized, clean database. And, if the NYT is worried about it, I’m inclined to believe it is targeting the corruption versus creating a surveillance state. The NYT would be applauding a surveillance state.
I think we already have mass surveillance being conducted by the 3 letter agencies.
What we have on the financial side of the Government is deliberate incompetence to enable fraud.
Maybe I’m reading this wrong, but it seems like this Palantir deal is to help clean up the fraud and money laundering by establishing one centralized, clean database. And, if the NYT is worried about it, I’m inclined to believe it is targeting the corruption versus creating a surveillance state. The NYT would be applauding a surveillance state.