All the scientific stuff is reliable. Basic information about businesses is bound to be reliable. I asked you to try an experiment, that was ignored in favor of an appeal to authority. All scientific stuff my chuff.
I guess you didn't bother to read my review. The article on LENR passed muster. I even added a test that was rigged, about Halton Arp, and that entry passed muster. How can you say I did not do the experiment? What authority did I appeal to? The only source I was comparing their entries to was my own independent research. You have an odd habit when confronted with direct testing. You demand it, and then you don't like a contrary result. You still don't explain what your beef is with Wikipedia over LENR. Do you even understand LENR? Do you have answers where the researchers don't? Do you have a scientific education? All I detect here is that nose for hopium got rubbed in reality.
You would make more sense if you answered directly. The article on LENR made no appeal to authority. It was thoroughly substantiated by footnotes to source material and was a fair recount of where matters stand. And I repeat, I guess you didn't bother to read my review, and you are not explaining or justifying your cryptic answers. I deem this "anti-communication": that which has the seeming appearance of communication, but is calculated to prevent a meeting of the minds.
All the scientific stuff is reliable. Basic information about businesses is bound to be reliable. I asked you to try an experiment, that was ignored in favor of an appeal to authority. All scientific stuff my chuff.
I guess you didn't bother to read my review. The article on LENR passed muster. I even added a test that was rigged, about Halton Arp, and that entry passed muster. How can you say I did not do the experiment? What authority did I appeal to? The only source I was comparing their entries to was my own independent research. You have an odd habit when confronted with direct testing. You demand it, and then you don't like a contrary result. You still don't explain what your beef is with Wikipedia over LENR. Do you even understand LENR? Do you have answers where the researchers don't? Do you have a scientific education? All I detect here is that nose for hopium got rubbed in reality.
A fallacy. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Appeal-to-Authority
Blocked.
You would make more sense if you answered directly. The article on LENR made no appeal to authority. It was thoroughly substantiated by footnotes to source material and was a fair recount of where matters stand. And I repeat, I guess you didn't bother to read my review, and you are not explaining or justifying your cryptic answers. I deem this "anti-communication": that which has the seeming appearance of communication, but is calculated to prevent a meeting of the minds.