Well… I remember watching the news that day and one of the planes went right through the tower completely intact before exploding after it partly emerged from the other side. After that there was a black text box over the part of the screen so you could not see it again when they replayed it. Not sure how any real plane could do that.
The street level videos of the planes hitting the towers are clearly fakes. In one of them you can see the layers of the image
Yeah, planes versus no-planes is one of the topics where fist fights nearly break out between 9/11 Truthers.
I do agree with you that many of the videos that are replayed to the public are suspicious in their appearance and are suggestive of CGI manipulation. I think this is where the no-planes theory gets its legs. But it's not an either-or situation.
In my mind what fits the bulk of the evidence is the proposition that real, but substituted, planes did strike the twin towers ... and studio CGI was applied to the film reels. The towers were of course taken down through explosives in controlled demolition. The planes were the excuse and show pieces.
Regarding the video evidence, I've spoken to 9/11 researchers who claim something curious. They say that the video shown on day one is distinctly different from the "same" videos displayed on day two and onward. This includes the color of the sky changing - becoming hazy whitish instead of the actual clear blue sky of the morning of 9/11/2001. If true this strongly indicates doctoring and/or pre-production preparation. So what you remember is interesting. Until there is a declas release of film footage, one of desiderata of researcher is to source home video tapes of telecasts shown on 9/11 versus telecasts shown on subsequent days.
Well… I remember watching the news that day and one of the planes went right through the tower completely intact before exploding after it partly emerged from the other side. After that there was a black text box over the part of the screen so you could not see it again when they replayed it. Not sure how any real plane could do that.
The street level videos of the planes hitting the towers are clearly fakes. In one of them you can see the layers of the image
Yeah, planes versus no-planes is one of the topics where fist fights nearly break out between 9/11 Truthers.
I do agree with you that many of the videos that are replayed to the public are suspicious in their appearance and are suggestive of CGI manipulation. I think this is where the no-planes theory gets its legs. But it's not an either-or situation.
In my mind what fits the bulk of the evidence is the proposition that real, but substituted, planes did strike the twin towers ... and studio CGI was applied to the film reels. The towers were of course taken down through explosives in controlled demolition. The planes were the excuse and show pieces.
Regarding the video evidence, I've spoken to 9/11 researchers who claim something curious. They say that the video shown on day one is distinctly different from the "same" videos displayed on day two and onward. This includes the color of the sky changing - becoming hazy whitish instead of the actual clear blue sky of the morning of 9/11/2001. If true this strongly indicates doctoring and/or pre-production preparation. So what you remember is interesting. Until there is a declas release of film footage, one of desiderata of researcher is to source home video tapes of telecasts shown on 9/11 versus telecasts shown on subsequent days.