There is no doubt we’re being played, the question, as always, is who is playing us? My barometer is based on who sensationalizes a story first.
One of the first news organizations to sound the alarm on this Palantir contract was the New York Times. That indicates the DS is worried this database is going to solidify the Administration’s ability to stop the laundering of our tax dollars.
My second thought is, how many times were we told to be careful who we follow? If news sites we consider to be conservative run with a derivative of a NYT article, what does that tell us? They’re either paytriots who don’t care what they say as long as it gets clicks, or, they’re controlled opposition.
Yes, we should challenge everything and analyze the reality. The DS already spies on all of us, they already have that capability. The intent of this database is to clean up the intentionally weak financial systems that enable the DS to misappropriate money to fund their operations.
There is no doubt we’re being played, the question, as always, is who is playing us? My barometer is based on who sensationalizes a story first.
One of the first news organizations to sound the alarm on this Palantir contract was the New York Times. That indicates the DS is worried this database is going to solidify the Administration’s ability to stop the laundering of our tax dollars.
My second thought is, how many times were we told to be careful who we follow? If news sites we consider to be conservative run with a derivative of a NYT article, what does that tell us? They’re either paytriots who don’t care what they say as long as it gets clicks, or, they’re controlled opposition.
Yes, we should challenge everything and analyze the reality. The DS already spies on all of us, they already have that capability. The intent of this database is to clean up the intentionally weak financial systems that enable the DS to misappropriate money to fund their operations.
Well said. Accounts will make a huge deal out of this to get the views and money.