She has no exclusives(just like all the other shills)
Liz Crokin came to the aid and defense of Craig Sawyer who worked for Hillary Clinton and was caught threatening people for exposing his connection to human trafficking. I have the messages.
Liz said it was raddd that Hillary Clinton was a presidential nominee.
Liz muted H. Blessington who asked questions about Michael Flynn on a call....
Liz were taking pictures with Nikki Sixx. He is one of the Motley Crew members who is said according to legal documents to be apart of a Satanic crew that rapes young girls as stated by Mick Mars.
There is SOOO much more but simply telling people rarely works when it is contrary to their established opinions...
it's the whole discernment thing, people have to actually USE it..............simply being told doesn't work and the mentality of being told things they want to hear is why so many still look to people that those with discernment see are dripping with NOPE!
There is SOOO much more but simply telling people rarely works when it is contrary to their established opinions...
I'm literally asking you for sources to share because I am genuinely interested and yet you didn't really provide anything and even shrugged me off. As my name implys, I dig and like to dig. The things you claim I can not find easily. Is Craig Sawyer a bad dude?, sure searches return that to be true and he's sketchy, absolutely. But where is the Liz connection?
Personally, I think Flynn is not someone to trust. I think he leads people astray. So if there were questions on Flynn, I'd actually be interested in the context of the situation and what was being muted or who had what opinion and why. Do I think Crokin has it all figured out and is right on everything?, no I don't. Is she raising people to consider that powerful people do evil things?, yes and credit should at least be due to her on that.
So you really have only left me to think you are just a shill with an established opinion that you claim everyone else has. Unless you spend the time to share your sources, which I'd enjoy.
OK, I was kinda drive-bying the comment so the Blessington one may be a bit to obscure but Crokin is decidedly a Flynntard(you can't really be on the same page with people you aren't on the same page with....) and I don't remember where I have the praising Hillary bit from, the thing is you have to look at who they defend, who they befriend, who they get along with and who they attack, Crokin is slippery but their need for symbolism is in her case very much apparent in her chosen profile pic...
My way of looking at people isn't one of default trust, it's one of default distrust, and Crokin is fairly consistently sketch when you start looking at details and what is in the background as well as her past(don't really believe that anyone high profile get to be red-pilled for real, their bed's have been long made and established)
She is a loud voice, but does she ever say anything new and do more than put her wording to what is already known/suspected?
The Sawyer connection: a former Navy SEAL and founder of Veterans For Child Rescue (V4CR), has collaborated with Crokin on anti-trafficking advocacy. A 2019 interview on Crokin’s youtube channel (since removed but referenced in Qanon blogs like 'we are the news') shows Crokin praising Sawyer’s work. In 2020, when Sawyer faced criticism from Qanon followers for allegedly misusing V4CR funds, Crokin defended him on X (archived posts on pastebin show her calling critics 'disinfo agents').
My digging isn't always the most autistically organized but I do tend to have a basis for what I say, digging it back up again however is a job of work that I usually can't be bothered with(my IRL life taking precedence over my online one), I kinda lose interest once I find something, at least I do until the next thing I come across that makes my brain go 'wait a minute...!', you are right in thinking that I've made up my mind about Crokin and so far I haven't seen anything that has made me go 'wait a minute' in regard to that oppinion(which now has to be the 'could she be good?' kind of question rather than the 'is she bad' that is my default)
Alright, well I will go digging on the things you expanded on for sure. I personally don't care for Crokin one way or another, the only thing I consider good is she's made people realize elites can do bad things (nothing I didn't know already though as I'm an old conspiracy junkie), otherwise I don't really follow her as much as you might have. I do like to look at possibilities on all sides of things though. I tend to have a default of distrust as well and especially when it's high profile people, so I totally get it. Thanks for elaborating.
She has no exclusives(just like all the other shills)
Liz Crokin came to the aid and defense of Craig Sawyer who worked for Hillary Clinton and was caught threatening people for exposing his connection to human trafficking. I have the messages.
Liz said it was raddd that Hillary Clinton was a presidential nominee.
Liz muted H. Blessington who asked questions about Michael Flynn on a call....
Liz were taking pictures with Nikki Sixx. He is one of the Motley Crew members who is said according to legal documents to be apart of a Satanic crew that rapes young girls as stated by Mick Mars.
There is SOOO much more but simply telling people rarely works when it is contrary to their established opinions...
it's the whole discernment thing, people have to actually USE it..............simply being told doesn't work and the mentality of being told things they want to hear is why so many still look to people that those with discernment see are dripping with NOPE!
What is the context of Liz saying Hillary was rad? Was it when she was pre-red pilled and all about making it in Hollywood and celeb drama?
Who is H. Blessington?
Again what was the context of the pictures with Nikki Sixx? Pre-red pilled? I found a picture of Crokin with Sixx's wife at some women's Kentucky derby event in 2015 which would be pre-red pilled. (https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/author-liz-crokin-celebrity-dermatologist-anna-guanche-news-photo/472042958). I hope you don't have any pictures with any celebs or musicians from back in the day because otherwise you could be claimed to be part of some satanic crew.
I'm literally asking you for sources to share because I am genuinely interested and yet you didn't really provide anything and even shrugged me off. As my name implys, I dig and like to dig. The things you claim I can not find easily. Is Craig Sawyer a bad dude?, sure searches return that to be true and he's sketchy, absolutely. But where is the Liz connection?
Personally, I think Flynn is not someone to trust. I think he leads people astray. So if there were questions on Flynn, I'd actually be interested in the context of the situation and what was being muted or who had what opinion and why. Do I think Crokin has it all figured out and is right on everything?, no I don't. Is she raising people to consider that powerful people do evil things?, yes and credit should at least be due to her on that.
So you really have only left me to think you are just a shill with an established opinion that you claim everyone else has. Unless you spend the time to share your sources, which I'd enjoy.
OK, I was kinda drive-bying the comment so the Blessington one may be a bit to obscure but Crokin is decidedly a Flynntard(you can't really be on the same page with people you aren't on the same page with....) and I don't remember where I have the praising Hillary bit from, the thing is you have to look at who they defend, who they befriend, who they get along with and who they attack, Crokin is slippery but their need for symbolism is in her case very much apparent in her chosen profile pic...
My way of looking at people isn't one of default trust, it's one of default distrust, and Crokin is fairly consistently sketch when you start looking at details and what is in the background as well as her past(don't really believe that anyone high profile get to be red-pilled for real, their bed's have been long made and established)
She is a loud voice, but does she ever say anything new and do more than put her wording to what is already known/suspected?
The Sawyer connection: a former Navy SEAL and founder of Veterans For Child Rescue (V4CR), has collaborated with Crokin on anti-trafficking advocacy. A 2019 interview on Crokin’s youtube channel (since removed but referenced in Qanon blogs like 'we are the news') shows Crokin praising Sawyer’s work. In 2020, when Sawyer faced criticism from Qanon followers for allegedly misusing V4CR funds, Crokin defended him on X (archived posts on pastebin show her calling critics 'disinfo agents').
There was actually a thread on GAW in 2021 claiming he threatened a whistleblower, couldn't immediately find that but did find this: https://greatawakening.win/p/140cSE6xEu/deep-dive-on-craig-sawyer-by-dee/
My digging isn't always the most autistically organized but I do tend to have a basis for what I say, digging it back up again however is a job of work that I usually can't be bothered with(my IRL life taking precedence over my online one), I kinda lose interest once I find something, at least I do until the next thing I come across that makes my brain go 'wait a minute...!', you are right in thinking that I've made up my mind about Crokin and so far I haven't seen anything that has made me go 'wait a minute' in regard to that oppinion(which now has to be the 'could she be good?' kind of question rather than the 'is she bad' that is my default)
Alright, well I will go digging on the things you expanded on for sure. I personally don't care for Crokin one way or another, the only thing I consider good is she's made people realize elites can do bad things (nothing I didn't know already though as I'm an old conspiracy junkie), otherwise I don't really follow her as much as you might have. I do like to look at possibilities on all sides of things though. I tend to have a default of distrust as well and especially when it's high profile people, so I totally get it. Thanks for elaborating.