Lol, you grab the crappiest choices of proof. Strawman fallacy. You're building up false criteria that, if true, prove the entire debate.... not so. How about you address the gross impossibility of a once ever project, humans greatest accomplishment, no records, no tech, and no proof except settling dust and a laser reflection? Do you hear yourself? That's how we prove our trip TO THE MOON?
Killer space robot thinks that he’s the arbiter of truth and the guardian of knowledge 🤪 I have to admit, though I admire his dedication to try to sideline this entire conversation that everyone everyone’s having here. He’s sticking to point. Almost too hard. By now, most people would’ve just given up and gone on with their lives, but he has something to prove doesn’t he. You have to believe the moon landing didn’t happen, and until you do, he won’t quit. Weird. Especially on a Q forum where people are taught to think for themselves.
Plenty of records and data, including samples. End of the market for the systems, which go out of production, along with the manufacturers. Plenty of proof, worldwide audience for its doing, returned samples, astronaut testimony. Everything you could want, if you were rational about it. A laser reflection that couldn't exist without a retro-reflector. Visible remains of the lander. What more is necessary? What more is possible? You are not questioning in good faith, for you seem to want a species of proof beyond anything that could be provided.
Lol, you grab the crappiest choices of proof. Strawman fallacy. You're building up false criteria that, if true, prove the entire debate.... not so. How about you address the gross impossibility of a once ever project, humans greatest accomplishment, no records, no tech, and no proof except settling dust and a laser reflection? Do you hear yourself? That's how we prove our trip TO THE MOON?
Killer space robot thinks that he’s the arbiter of truth and the guardian of knowledge 🤪 I have to admit, though I admire his dedication to try to sideline this entire conversation that everyone everyone’s having here. He’s sticking to point. Almost too hard. By now, most people would’ve just given up and gone on with their lives, but he has something to prove doesn’t he. You have to believe the moon landing didn’t happen, and until you do, he won’t quit. Weird. Especially on a Q forum where people are taught to think for themselves.
Plenty of records and data, including samples. End of the market for the systems, which go out of production, along with the manufacturers. Plenty of proof, worldwide audience for its doing, returned samples, astronaut testimony. Everything you could want, if you were rational about it. A laser reflection that couldn't exist without a retro-reflector. Visible remains of the lander. What more is necessary? What more is possible? You are not questioning in good faith, for you seem to want a species of proof beyond anything that could be provided.