"You know, some people think the Habsburgs need to make a comeback." A cabalist confessing to me in a conversation, about their desire to absolute rule by monarchy.
I've spoken to ranking cabalists who confirmed that the restored monarchy is the goal. Now shared? So where in the bible does it say that restoring the line of Nebakanezzer on the throne of Babylon is sign of victory?
Monarchy for the win? The term 'King of kings' denotes no more kings and kings run counter to the spirit of 1776.
This has finally gone 180, soon to go 360 to show why it's going to be biblical in that every book of the bible shows the cycle of this very mistake. And yes history is the witness to the evil perpetrated by monarchs with absolute rule. Political solutions to political problems give rise to need for kings. it isn't the solution, it's more of the problem.
p.s. The House of Saud has been re-titled, so if one looks to a king of the region, that would be the first in line. Maybe they all are, but the other 'lines' are canaanite/babylonian.
Its destruction (the babylonian) would be biblical. Its rise again will also be biblical.
That's what the books are describing.
"You know, some people think the Habsburgs need to make a comeback." A cabalist confessing to me in a conversation, about their desire to absolute rule by monarchy.
I've spoken to ranking cabalists who confirmed that the restored monarchy is the goal. Now shared? So where in the bible does it say that restoring the line of Nebakanezzer on the throne of Babylon is sign of victory?
Monarchy for the win? The term 'King of kings' denotes no more kings and kings run counter to the spirit of 1776.
This has finally gone 180, soon to go 360 to show why it's going to be biblical in that every book of the bible shows the cycle of this very mistake. And yes history is the witness to the evil perpetrated by monarchs with absolute rule. Political solutions to political problems give rise to need for kings. it isn't the solution, it's more of the problem.
p.s. The House of Saud has been re-titled, so if one looks to a king of the region, that would be the first in line. Maybe they all are, but the other 'lines' are canaanite/babylonian.
Its destruction (the babylonian) would be biblical. Its rise again will also be biblical. That's what the books are describing.