Fuck off. The land that would be sold would naturally be the land that is more accessible than not. That means it's primarily going to steal land that everyone uses for recreation.
"Muh economic development" oh blow it out your ass with this 'GDP GO UP' shit.
My guy the land was already stolen when the Feds hoovered that shit up without remitting it back to the States. You already have no actual rights to that land, you are a glorified tenant with access priviledges that can be stripped at a moments notice by the Feds.
Because even if you want to assume best case no government tomfoolery, the simple fact of the matter is that with the Feds in charge of it, that means "your" land is actually property of that 80% who lives in the East of the US.
Do you really want "your" land dictated by those hundreds of miles away? Those people out East, who by your own words "...have no idea how free it is being able to just.... go somewhere."
You're inventing hypotheticals that don't work because BLM/NFS land is already about as unrestricted as possible. There's few regulations on them for recre use, mostly they're just about fire control.
How the fuck are you actually arguing it could be "better" when it's already fine? It literally only has potential to get worse, which is what happens to almost every plot of state owned land. Go pick a state and actually look up the laws on what state land can be used for, and it's typically significantly restricted. No OHVs, no shooting, no fires, etc.
There are plots of land that isn't for sale that is landlocked behind BLM/NFS land and that means the trailheads go through that sellable land.
How much of a cynical shekel bandit do you have to be to think that it's better for everyone to put up a fence on that land and charge people to walk through what they used to do for free? That's what it's like in Ireland and the UK. You can't get to certain heritage cites without paying the farmer who controls the one road to it. He does t own the site, but he charges you to get to ancestoral history. That's fucking vile.
Fuck off. The land that would be sold would naturally be the land that is more accessible than not. That means it's primarily going to steal land that everyone uses for recreation.
"Muh economic development" oh blow it out your ass with this 'GDP GO UP' shit.
My guy the land was already stolen when the Feds hoovered that shit up without remitting it back to the States. You already have no actual rights to that land, you are a glorified tenant with access priviledges that can be stripped at a moments notice by the Feds.
What do I give a shit if "muh states" has it?
Because even if you want to assume best case no government tomfoolery, the simple fact of the matter is that with the Feds in charge of it, that means "your" land is actually property of that 80% who lives in the East of the US.
Do you really want "your" land dictated by those hundreds of miles away? Those people out East, who by your own words "...have no idea how free it is being able to just.... go somewhere."
You're inventing hypotheticals that don't work because BLM/NFS land is already about as unrestricted as possible. There's few regulations on them for recre use, mostly they're just about fire control.
How the fuck are you actually arguing it could be "better" when it's already fine? It literally only has potential to get worse, which is what happens to almost every plot of state owned land. Go pick a state and actually look up the laws on what state land can be used for, and it's typically significantly restricted. No OHVs, no shooting, no fires, etc.
There are plots of land that isn't for sale that is landlocked behind BLM/NFS land and that means the trailheads go through that sellable land.
How much of a cynical shekel bandit do you have to be to think that it's better for everyone to put up a fence on that land and charge people to walk through what they used to do for free? That's what it's like in Ireland and the UK. You can't get to certain heritage cites without paying the farmer who controls the one road to it. He does t own the site, but he charges you to get to ancestoral history. That's fucking vile.
Bill Clinton locked us out anyway. They built gates and big bears on the roads many years ago and made it unuseable.
Look up his roadless initiative.