What has stealth got to do with that? No surprise that "retaliatory actions" did not occur before the bombing. And no surprise that the Iranian command-and-control system is probably severely damaged, hindering any damage assessment, deliberation over what to do, and execution of any plan. There is such a thing as a response time loop (Col. John Boyd's OODA Loop).
I wasn't arguing. I was trying to figure out which question you were asking, since there seemed to be two questions in play, that I had answered previously. But you are quite welcome to the answers. People have a lot of misconceptions about what "stealth" means, and what it really means is sometimes a bit subtle.
What has stealth got to do with that? No surprise that "retaliatory actions" did not occur before the bombing. And no surprise that the Iranian command-and-control system is probably severely damaged, hindering any damage assessment, deliberation over what to do, and execution of any plan. There is such a thing as a response time loop (Col. John Boyd's OODA Loop).
You have to ask the guy who wrote “ It also fits perfectly with stealth characteristics”
Stealth had to do with why no shots were fired at them coming in or going out.
Stealth had nothing to do with Iranian retaliatory actions.
I am only repeating myself for your sake.
So the answer to my question is “no it does not”. That’s all i needed to know. It was not an argument, but a simple question.
I wasn't arguing. I was trying to figure out which question you were asking, since there seemed to be two questions in play, that I had answered previously. But you are quite welcome to the answers. People have a lot of misconceptions about what "stealth" means, and what it really means is sometimes a bit subtle.