Do you have anything to corroborate that this was rape?
Why else would the soldier have his pants around his ankles visible at 34-36 second time stamp in the video? I mean unless they defacated on the prisoner there's no other explanation, and if so, is a form of torture all the same.
Well, whose body and cavity? I see left sided pants down, not right from video point of view in those brief seconds.
Not trying to argue, you know how I am as a fellow anon, fren, and baker in the past. Im just analyzing what im seeing and as we know you cannot always trust that digitally.
I see left sided pants down, not right from video point of view in those brief seconds.
Not sure how that proves that its rape and nothing else.
Im just analyzing what im seeing and as we know you cannot always trust that digitally.
Then why is it that so many people who are "analyzing" it, and know that this is most definitely part of a psyop, just jump to conclusion that it has to be rape?
Why else would the soldier have his pants around his ankles visible at 34-36 second time stamp in the video? I mean unless they defacated on the prisoner there's no other explanation, and if so, is a form of torture all the same.
Could be body cavity search, for one thing.
Well, whose body and cavity? I see left sided pants down, not right from video point of view in those brief seconds.
Not trying to argue, you know how I am as a fellow anon, fren, and baker in the past. Im just analyzing what im seeing and as we know you cannot always trust that digitally.
Whoever the ununiformed guy is.
Not sure how that proves that its rape and nothing else.
Then why is it that so many people who are "analyzing" it, and know that this is most definitely part of a psyop, just jump to conclusion that it has to be rape?