https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY?si=MwIbegPXjuQ-f_0m
A very interesting lecture if you have the time to listen to it. She has an interesting book too.
She talks about how it was physically impossible for the twin towers to collapse in the way we were told when hit by a plane, and that it was likely directed energy weapons responsible for the destruction of the buildings.
This is one of the most convincing takes I've ever heard on how the towers collapsed.
No, it was a high level of aluminum oxide, melted iron, and ferric oxide---all consistent with a fire in which the vapor of melted aircraft aluminum was ignited and also burned. And thermite is not an explosive.
CNN tell you this haha
I think I said nano-thermite FWIW….which is, of course, explosive and capable of melting steel. You seem very self-assured regarding your 9/11 knowledge tho. Also, iron melting point = 2800F Jet fuel burns at ~ 1800F.
Thermite of any kind is a pyrotechnic, not an explosive (no evolution of hot gases). The adiabatic flame temperature of kerosene (jet fuel) is 3801 F. In rocket engines, it can reach 4000 F. They make it burn at lower temperature (lean mixture) in a jet engine in order to avoid melting the turbine blades, which was a problem for the first jet engines. My career involved jet propulsion thermodynamics. In any case, it does not require that steel actually melt to lose essentially all its strength. 70% of strength is lost by structural steel at a temperature of 600 C (1112 F). (The adiabatic flame temperature of burning aluminum with oxygen is 6750 F. I've seen no one take burning aluminum into account.)