The whole Russia collusion hoax was based on what? You might say the Steel dossier.
However, there was something else the DNC used to push the Russia collusion hoax. In fact, the DNC sued the Russian Federation and the Trump administration in the SDNY court system for a conspiracy to denigrate the Democratic nominee (HRC) and bolster Donald Trump.
If the current Trump admin / intelligence agencies attempted to validate the authenticity of evidence that showed Trump was colluding with Russia, what would they find?
This leads back to this Q post from Aug 11 2018.
Here is the link to the court case the DNC started to claim collusion between Russia and Trump. Read page 2: Section III A,
"Trump announces his candidacy as President and Russia begins it's attack on DNC computer systems."
https://www.cohenmilsteinprocessserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DNC-COMPLAINT-STAMPED.pdf
Here is the second link in Q post 1842:
"WikiLeaks released troves of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta ahead of the 2016 election. The U.S. intelligence community has tied the email releases to the broader plot by the Russian government to interfere in the election."
Post from Benny Johnson 6 days ago:
The Department of Justice just confirmed that President Obama ordered the FBI to shut down the Clinton email scandal. FBI Director James Comey followed orders and buried it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ba8SQ9F3/the-department-of-justice-just-c/c/
What was it that shook Bongino to his core?
"We cannot run a Republic like this. I will never be the same after learning what I have learned".
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BaDBLdNZ/look-what-dan-bongino-posted-tod/c/
Seth Rich's murder by the DNC. Are they going to roll out the truth? I bet they do!
Seth Rich gave those DNC emails to Wikileaks, it wasn't Russia and they killed him for it.
Obama committed treason, you don't walk away from that.
You don't attempt a coup against the country and walk away free.
They murdered Seth Rich, you don't walk away from murder charges.
Stop dooming, your negative attitude is not appreciated here.
An objective assessment of a likely outcome based on historical precedent is not “dooming”.
It ain’t all sunshine and rainbows out there. I hope more than anything we get some actual justice, but expressing reservations about that should not be something that is just dismissed automatically as dooming.
Are we here to critically discuss things and analyze possible/likely outcomes or are we here just to be an echo chamber that feeds each other what we want to read/hear?