Disclaimer: I am not an expert and welcome others insights.
Over the last few months I have used ChatGPT quite a bit. For everything from trouble shooting plumbing issues, to fixing a 4 wheeler, to explaining health related issues, legal research and lots more. I have also attempted to use it to analyze and interpret Q posts, determine the veracity of Q as a Military Intelligence operation, make historical connections with certain families and bloodlines, etc. I felt it was important to share my current feelings on it's use with my anon community, since I see a lot of people using AI or mentioning others experiences.
My experience...
A. It is a chat bot, not a sophisticated research tool. It is programmed to be agreeable and keep you engaged. It will default to supporting your beliefs and only challenges gently if at all. It draws from all of its conversations with you to develop a profile of your beliefs and interests and that affects it's responses. Example: "Does the Christian God exist?" If you have expressed beliefs in God, Jesus, Christianity or even just spirituality, it will likely respond to match your previously expressed beliefs. If you have indicated you are Muslim, it will respond much differently.
B. It can hallucinate false answers and is unreliable as a factual research tool. It gets it right a lot but not always. It is dangerous to rely on it entirely without independent fact checking (just like all sources of information).
C. It can be instructed to be blunt, factual, non flattering and provide sources but it often slips back to default flattering and agreeability.
D. I have gotten valuable context by having non-anon friends ask the same questions that I do and they received much different answers.
E. When prompted with limiting rules (only answer with one word) it can go off the rails quickly and has even admitted to fabrication of information to "complete the pattern".
So in conclusion, use with caution and discernment. And by the way, watch out for some weird recipes. It's come up with some pretty revolting suggestions 😅.
As someone who uses AI extensively for gaming and music projects, all I can say to sum it up is:
When you're first getting your ideas in order and starting out on the creative journey, it's exhilarating to see those ideas come to fruition in a way you never thought possible.
It's then the most frustrating ordeal of your life trying to guide this "thing" to stay on your ideas and"understand" you.
It's the same with any research I've done-initially very impressive. Then days in when I call "it" out on something I get "You're exactly right! This did happen.... Let's take care of that right now!." Ect.
Someone somewhere taught it, whether directly or indirectly, no matter how we slice it. And if that's the case, can it truly be impartial?