I like his approach of "ignoring the fringe" because the fringe could be a non-existent strawman that derails productive discourse. It's like the label "MAGA extremist" which is all but worthless since it is just as likely to refer to an undercover agent as it is an average citizen.
There was a legit , facist "far right" back when Trump was running for his first term, and lasted for a little after. They were legit white nationalists, but they're not very visible anymore. It was probably a tiny fraction of the whole maga movement back then, but it's the only people msm focused on.
Where is this far right he condemns?
I like his approach of "ignoring the fringe" because the fringe could be a non-existent strawman that derails productive discourse. It's like the label "MAGA extremist" which is all but worthless since it is just as likely to refer to an undercover agent as it is an average citizen.
There was a legit , facist "far right" back when Trump was running for his first term, and lasted for a little after. They were legit white nationalists, but they're not very visible anymore. It was probably a tiny fraction of the whole maga movement back then, but it's the only people msm focused on.
I have to say Devin Stack at Blackpilled has a point.