(1) She engaged in deprivation of rights under color of law, to further Harris/Walz (communists) getting elected. (2) This goes up to treason if they were receiving funding from countries that oppose the USA remaining a constitutional republic.
I suspect they're saying treason and not sedition because they have the receipts for the foreign funding. You are correct that without the receipts, this would merely be sedition.
(1) She engaged in deprivation of rights under color of law, to further Harris/Walz (communists) getting elected. (2) This goes up to treason if they were receiving funding from countries that oppose the USA remaining a constitutional republic.
I suspect they're saying treason and not sedition because they have the receipts for the foreign funding. You are correct that without the receipts, this would merely be sedition.