***** Scrubbed for today *****
T-0 is currently 19:59 ET
Livestreams:
Nasaspaceflight (NOT affiliated with NASA):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DcVq01rM4M
Everyday Astronaut:
Comments (33)
sorted by:
For all those who say NASA laundered money, is a deep state asset, fakes sh#t, yeah, you're probably right. But SpaceX is part of the revelation. The most transparent space program to ever exist. 24x7 livestreams of their entire operation at Starbase. A small fraction of the govt contract money that Boeing recd for the commercial crew program, yet they've launched 25x as many astronauts (and returned them to Earth 😆)
You mean like that Polaris Spacewalk and Tesla in space stunt.......
We got to see all of it. And those were both privately funded, it didn't cost us anything. Awesome amirite ?
LOL if forgery/movie making is awesome then I guess both stunts did inded convince quite a few people that they were real.
Go watch a Falcon Heavy or Starship launch, and let me know if you still think it is forgery.
I saw both of those launches. I can see how it looks like forgeries. I can go on some ai program and make a video of anything you can imagine.
It looks like it because they ARE.
Elon said it best.
Sauce?
I was ONLY referring to Polaris Spacewalk and Tesla in space as forgeries...Cant speak to the other stuff....Plenty of videos and info for anons to dig on, assuming they want to know.
Neither of these missions you reference had anything to do with NASA. Privately funded, private astronauts. The Tesla in space was SpaceX proving to themselves that the Falcon Heavy system worked. Why on Earth would they fake a test flight ? And the astronauts who flew on Polaris Dawn have done tons and tons of interviews on every podcast out there. The man who did the spacewalk, Jared Issacman, if you recall was tapped by Trump to be the next NASA administrator (which didn't happen for some ass reason)
Didnt say they had anything to do with NASA...I said the Polaris Spacewalk and Tesla in space were FAKE and there is plenty of evidence of such ....
....Nasa Astronots gave a lot of interviews as well,
Actually I believe SpaceX returned MORE people to Earth than they took to the ISS - since they had to send one of their rockets up to bring back Boeing's crew.
u/#correct
u/#kek
I asked Grok.
So - SpaceX has launched 60 people to the ISS (including the 4 currently there as part of Crew 11). They brought back 58 people. The 4 from Crew 11 will make that 62 people brought back once they complete that mission. That means that when that ship returns to Earth SpaceX will have (safely) sent 60 people and returned 62.
I don't think that has ever happened before - except for shuttles and rockets blowing up. Boeing will get a nice footnote or an asterisk in the history books for that.
...in one piece...and still breathing.
u/#correct
Transparent? Relatively, probably. Secretive? Of course. What percentage of data do you think Space X has disseminated to the public? I'd go 5 percent. The government doesn't let you play George Jetson without some pre-conditions....
Very true. Rocket tech is subject to ITAR regulations. So there is a lot that cannot be made public
Now compare this to any of their competitors
f
Pretty interesting
https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117956/documents/HMKP-119-JU00-20250226-SD003.pdf
WaPo hit piece. Not surprised. Fake new gonna fake news.
What info is fake?
Are you saying the numbers are not accurate.
If CNN pushed a hit piece on Trump would you believe any of it?
I didnt view it as a hit piece.....so in other words you didnt read it and have NO IDEA and simply discount it because Wapo sucks and you love SpaceX....
Besides MOST people know that Tesla and Space X got tons of govermnent help , so not understanding why you AUTO call this a hit piece?
Ok...give me some time and I will read it and give you the facts. But right now there is a starship launch and I wont be distracted! 😆
I read most of it. Wild claims, no sources, its a hit piece.
LOL...they show the sources..
...and I would read whatever CNN published and try to determine what part was truth and what part is false.
Recently Musk had a conversation explaining that in order to go to the moon, they would have to launch into earth orbit and then send 12 additional rockets to REFUEL the Space Ship. This should tell you something. How did the other attempts not do this ? What about Artemis ? The math didn't lie. Food for thought.
Read this:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BtGb0V0j/x/c/4eVLPvik8fp
ha ha, yeah thats a fun one , Thanks !
You're right the math doesn't lie. It makes perfect sense to me. You don't get how big starship actually is. It is the largest ship, and largest booster ever made. Ever, by any country. How did apollo and artemis not need refueling flights? Simple. They expend the entire vehicle. THEY THREW THE ENTIRE LAUNCH STACK AND SPACECRAFT IN THE GARBAGE CAN. Starship is 100% reusable. If the same mission costs 99% less when reusable than it does when throwing away the entire launch vehicle (the most expensive part of the mission) who gives a flying f#ck if it takes more launches?
People who keep saying "SpaceX is going to take 8 flights to get one ship to the moon, they're so inefficient!" Sounds like someone saying "hey let's take an airline flight and instead of flying back on the same plane, let's throw it away and buy another airliner instead to be more efficient"