...has absolutely nothing to do with CERN. It is a story by Lewis Carroll. Don't underestimate the allure of cleverness to a bright scientist. They have little else to brighten their day.
Joy, ALICE (re CERN) is an experiment not a conspiracy. It is most certainly not Hillary Rodham Clinton. I've seen white rabbits...and they are rabbits not Q references. I've even raised them for dinner.
This Q post is 7 years out of date. I don't see how it is relevant to anything.
Amen, sister. The drops are our master guide to what’s coming. One of the beauties of the drops is the amount of planning that went into this endeavor. Military planning at its finest. I often marvel at the big picture as it comes together. What a time to be alive!
And who says so? That may apply to statements made categorically, but not to statements that pertain to a point in time (like the status of nations). I'm used to messages being clear and understandable. Arcane and ambiguous are not methods of communication. But that is the scientific view of knowledge.
...has absolutely nothing to do with CERN. It is a story by Lewis Carroll. Don't underestimate the allure of cleverness to a bright scientist. They have little else to brighten their day.
HRC = Alice SA = Wonderland WHO ARE THE WHITE RABBITS? Re_read drops re: SA Have faith. For God & Country. Q
u/#q2049
Joy, ALICE (re CERN) is an experiment not a conspiracy. It is most certainly not Hillary Rodham Clinton. I've seen white rabbits...and they are rabbits not Q references. I've even raised them for dinner.
This Q post is 7 years out of date. I don't see how it is relevant to anything.
I respect Science but Q posts are never out of date .They are clues, maps & guidelines.
Amen, sister. The drops are our master guide to what’s coming. One of the beauties of the drops is the amount of planning that went into this endeavor. Military planning at its finest. I often marvel at the big picture as it comes together. What a time to be alive!
And who says so? That may apply to statements made categorically, but not to statements that pertain to a point in time (like the status of nations). I'm used to messages being clear and understandable. Arcane and ambiguous are not methods of communication. But that is the scientific view of knowledge.