The church shooting was a psyop. 48 hour rule applies, but uh, there's just too many coincidences at this point.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
I think we've been going through the precipice for the last 4 years. Q is/was banking on people waking up and stepping up to the plate to take responsibility for their nation.
But yea, the murder of little children is traumatic for most, non-desensitized humans, I'd say. The event itself was not simply dramatic. It was traumatic.
Sad is a complex set of emotions. Depressing and discouraging news, day after day decade after decade doesn't result in people just being sad.
Q's definition of precipice sounds like trauma is what I'm getting at:
u/#q4407
I don't think people have felt they were at the 'moment of destruction' during the past 4 yeras.
Hmmm... I see it differently. I don't equate precipice with trauma. And, having been a witness to plenty of trauma in my life and having observed its impacts, I can say that trauma is 90-95%+ destructive. Trauma tears the fabric of the heart and mind. Or rather, trauma IS the tearing of the fabric of the heart and mind, and traumatic events precipitate trauma.
The precipice is different, in my view. Take a look at where we derive the metaphorical use of this word from. A precipice is literally "a very steep rock face or cliff, especially a tall one". It is the edge of a cliff, where on one side, you are on solid ground, and the other side, no ground and instead a slope of such intensity that falling to the bottom due to gravity is essentially unavoidable.
To quote someone: "On the precipice" means being on the verge of a dangerous, difficult, or critical situation.
It's the edge, where the potential disaster becomes very clearly visible. One step to the left, and you're safe. One step to the right, and .... disaster.
Experiencing the precipice neither needs to be nor is inherently traumatic. The core emotional impact is, I would say, the shock factor, where the possibility if disaster becomes very, very real.
Look also at the context which Q drew on to highlight this concept: The Day the Earth Stood Still. (film. 2008 remake of a 1951 film). The concept is presented in the 2008 films as this:
The idea is that in order to make the next step forward, to make changes that are necessary to transcend the direction and baggage of the past, approaching the brink of disaster is an unavoidable process. That once disaster becomes clear in the mind, then the person, or people, are snapped out of their apathy and trance, and the when they see what could actually happen, take action. That action might be kinetic, but more than anything, its mental. It's a mental shift coupled with the energy to take action.
Change is not easy. It takes will power. But Q is describing how people will only (in this context) tap into that willpower when the reality of the destruction towards which the USA (or any nation, for that matter) is headed becomes exceedingly clear and apparent.
This is not traumatic, necessarily or even usually. No, its the disaster, when experienced, that is traumatic, and it inherently reduces the ability of someone to respond effectively to the situation. It dulls resilience, and forces the <person/people> into a numbed down survival mode that effectively shuts down much of the system in order to preserve the core ability. Aka survive.
Trauma is what the Cabal has been using again and again and again, in order to weaken our (the people's) resilience, our capacity to be effective, to see clearly, and to prosper towards health. This is true on an individual level, but also on a societal level. By weakening us, we become easy for them to control and manipulate.
This is why MK ultra essentially employed this approach. (Watch the Jason Bourne series. Good illustration.) This is why the so-called News continually pummels the entire population with trauma inducing news. Rape, murder, crime, corruption, disaster. etc. Not to inform us, so that we can take action. But to lull people into a state of reactionism (easier to control) or gradual depression (easier to manipulate) or apathy (same) or selfishness and self-focus (its all screwed; I'm going to look out for no 1, me.)
From this angle (and I'm simply presenting an angle, a perspective), the idea that White Hats would stage an event like the recent mass shooting - whether actual or fake - takes one to the territory of the League of Shadows, in Batman Begins. Where the league of shadows tries to inflict a mass trauma event on the entire population of Gotham City in order to rescue them, wake them up, and change. yeah, sure. No thanks! Right?
Anyway, those at my thoughts here. Trauma is harmful and destroys the healthy human condition. Its different from shock, even though the two may accompany each other in many circumstances.
0.02
What's an example of news that caused someone to feel trauma? My idea of trauma is that it is personal. Like being shot at for example. Or being assaulted.
When you hear of trauma victims, it's usually something very personal they went through. Hearing and watching the news doesn't seem like trauma in my view.
You've made a good point, and after I wrote that, I felt it was poorly expressed.
I'll try and articulate it better:
The News continually pummels the public with 'news' of traumatic events and incidents. They do this in a way that, over time, induces increased susceptibility to feeling traumatized, albeit in an unconscious and subconscious way, just below the surface. The public becomes desensitized, being led into a state of simply expecting to hear about bad and horrible stuff, all the time. This makes them ripe for all sorts of manipulation, with decreased resilience to negative influences, thoughts and ideas.
I think that in this sense, we, the public, are to a large extent 'traumatized' over and over by what we hear and see thought the 'News'. It's not shocking, because the process is intentionally executed over time. It's conditioning.
This interfaces with pushing, pulling and driving the public towards escape (Hollywood, TV, etc). So on the one hand, we are pummeled with bad news, often of what, if we experienced them personally, would be traumatic events. On the other hand, we are sold escapism in the form of 'entertainment' and consumerism (advertising).
This whole paradigm is harmful. It's also why real faith practice is so important. A person who is sincerely practicing religion will tune out of that paradigm more and focus on a wavelength that does the opposite: one which reinforces our natural optimism, our ability to resist negative thinking, and hopeful, constructive directions.
No, I agree in a sense. I don't think anyone experiences shocking trauma just by listening or watching a single news report. On the other hand, I do think that a core purpose of the Mockingbird propaganda machine 'News' is to, over time, indirectly traumatize the public with a constant barrage of news of what, if experienced personally, would be traumatic events.
How do you think Jesus would feel if he sat in front of the news and listened to it for a week? Would he be like, hey, that's just normal? It's not a big deal? Or would he weep?
The desensitized state the constant stream of news induces is a feature of trauma. Trauma will make you highly sensitized in some areas, but completely desensitized in others. People turn off their sensitivity as a means to coping with the intensity of the pain that trauma induces.
I don't know if its a stretch, but I think it might not be entirely unreasonable to say that by and large, the populations living in our so-called modern Western nations, having been under mental attack for decades upon decades, live in an semi-unconscious traumatized state.
It is that state of mentality that the COVID psyop tapped into. Did you ever wonder why is it that some people just didn't buy it all, and yet large swathes of the population bought into it completely? I think its probably got to do with the underlying, unobserved mental state that these different parts of the community were living with.
Thoughts?