well technically according to the DSM-5, its a “condition”
Seems like semantic hair-splitting, but we can use it against them by saying that “gender affirming care” isn’t even treating a recognized mental or physical illness, just a “condition” that doesn’t require treatment… so anybody treating it is guilty of malpractice
well technically according to the DSM-5, its a “condition”
Seems like semantic hair-splitting, but we can use it against them by saying that “gender affirming care” isn’t even treating a recognized mental or physical illness, just a “condition” that doesn’t require treatment… so anybody treating it is guilty of malpractice