Ah yes, great article. Scoglio did great work on both the spike protein and nanotech fairytiles before his death. The author does a great job of highlighting the "elephants in the room" that Scoglio had pointed out. I followed his work, along with Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey closely almost from the start of COVID.

Another less known, but equally important figure was a microbiologist from England named Harold Hillman. He did most of his pioneering work in the 1970s and 1980s. In short, he stated most of the things about cells and neurons we all ASSUME TO BE TRUE are anything but. Namely, the cellular organelles we all learned about in high school biology. Hillman said all but the nucleus and mitochondria are effectively either "air bubbles" or "staining artifacts" caused by the required preparation for electron microscopy.

Most importantly, Hillman also pointed out that there was no such thing, LITERALLY, as a "cell receptor". This point alone totally destroys the entire boogeyman-virus narrative right alongside the spike protein nonsense. Because, allegedly, these fictional "cell receptors" are what get "tricked" into allowing the virus or protein into the cell.

What's amazing is, nobody has ever actually SEEN a cell receptor, and of course, no "viruses tricking one" and entering a cell. It's all a gigantic fairy tale.

Hillman issued about 50 questions to the scientific community at large back in the 1980s, and to this day, none have been answered or addressed. The reason for this is quite obvious of course. When the controlling cabal can't "debunk" something, they suppress and ignore it.

I've gone one step further than Hillman, leveraging the work of Antoine BeChamp and Gaston Naessans work with bacteria. Both of these men identified something BeChamp called a "Microzyma" and Naessans called a "Somatid" as the progenitor to all bacteria. Naessans went further with modern dark field microscopy by showing all bacteria begin from this "spore" and eventually return to being it when their job is complete. BeChamp showed these tiny spores were effectively indestructible, impervious to extreme heat and cold.

I have concluded that these microzyma/somatids are actually the BASIC UNIT OF LIFE....not the "cell". Within the cellular membrane are one or more "mitochondria" which are individual microzyma/somatids. And the nucleus is a group of cooperating somatids. The two primary "cellular organelles" that actually do exist, are actually this one "thing".

You can think of these "spores" as quite literally "stem cells", albeit they aren't "cells", they are the microzyma/somatid which can become a liver cell, an eyeball cell, a neuron, a bacteria, or dare I stretch my speculation too far, a "parasite" as well.

From the metaphysical perspective, we could call these spores a "Consciousness Unit" with equal precision. Within them are the instructions necessary in generating any and all "forms of life".

I admit this is all my personal, abstract speculation. I am not a trained scientist and don't have a lab full of equipment to draw these conclusions. I have simply drawn these, what I think are rather obvious conclusions once I realized we're being lied to about practically everything else.

I think life, nature and "reality" are quite simple to understand once you leave behind all the endless lies and deceptions we were taught. I've done several pieces on the fraud of Einstein, Bohr, Shroddinger showing their relativity, particle physics and quantum mechanics are all fraudulent as well. When the aether was killed by Einsteinism in the 1930s, it opened the door for all this deception.

One more thing worth noting, if you're familiar with HOW we're told DNA?RNA is made, via "transcription" within the cell but then realize Hillman said the "endoplasmic reticulum (ER)", "golgi complex" and "ribosomes" are all staining artifacts or air bubbles...and don't actually exist, this further annihilates both the boogyeman-virus story as well as the spike protein story. Because "DNA/RNA transcription" RELIES UPON the "jobs" these fictional cellular organelles are said to perform!

I've yet to see any definitive explanations as to exactly what this DNA/RNA "stuff" is. It appears obvious that it is some sort of unique identifier as per all the criminal forensics and paternity cases that at least have the appearance of legitimacy. That being said, I'm highly skeptical now as these things can also be easily manipulated. The whole "double helix" story is also a gigantic fairy tale, as Watson's "swinger" wife, an art professor at Oxford, just "drew something cool" one day and Watson and Crick decided it was a good a representation as any for their hypothetical DNA. To wit, there's only one known "photograph" of DNA, taken in 2013 I believe, which is just a grainy image of nothing more than "what they say is DNA'. Which could very well be the same thing as their alleged photographs of boogeyman-viruses.

One of the scientific researchers explained the whole process of "extracting DNA/RNA" from a sample which is littered with the addition of various chemicals, precursors, enzymes etc. to get the "final product". He made a great analogy, saying the DNA extraction process is kind of like somebody burning a piece of wood, after which concluding wood's primary components are smoke and ash.

Anyway, thanks for sharing the article. It was right up my alley and the author was a good writer as an added bonus!

As to all my other ramblings, yes, take your time. I dumped a lot on you, as I regularly do now. Time is speeding up and the controlling cabal is pulling out all their stops these days. The days of "sugar-coating" things are behind us as we're seeing here in GAW more and more.

As to the "belief shapers", yes, this is what the highest ranking cabal members are involved with. As the author pointed out, the people still locked into the mainstream narratives are trapped in hundreds of beliefs, assumptions, presumptions and speculation that are treated as "facts" by mainstream academia. They can't see the forest for the trees. I like to tell people, "can you start your investigation with only what you personally know for sure is true?". With a modicum of effort in this direction, you'll find out there are actually very few "facts" or "truths" in this world, because "this world" isn't the "material construct" we've been deceptively led to believe it is.

The "outer/material/physical" world is a temporary REFLECTION of human BELIEFS, both individually and collectively. In this sense, it's "old news", an 'after-effect" of ACTUAL REALITY. Actual reality is purely metaphysical, molded and formed by our thoughts, feelings, beliefs, imagination and dreams - these are what are REAL to all of us. These are the "architects" of the "outer reality". Our genes, enzymes, hormones, etc. are merely the resulting temporary EXPRESSION of our current BELIEFS. When you change your beliefs, you change the reflection presented to you by the outer, physical reality.

A lot to chew on. Take your time!

Tally Ho!