🖲️ Skyet poll: GAW opinion on ID checks?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
List of things I believe ID should be required for:
- Voting
- Running for office
- Becoming a citizen from foreign country
- Strip clubs, bars / night clubs, escort services
- Porn or gore websites, dating websites
- Alcohol, drugs, tobacco purchases (online and IRL)
- Being hired at a job
- Joining the military
- Picking up children from a school or event
- Getting a Commercial Driver's License (CDL)
- ...anything else, anons? please comment below! I am updating this list with the new additions. If I disagree with your submission I will wait for you to walk me through the Constitutionality of it. If I agree yet someone else disagrees, I will wait for them to walk me through the Unconstitutionality, and then remove it.
List of things I believe ID should in no way be required for:
- Everything not listed in the above
It’s 3 days max here in Cali to have a psychiatrist decide/eval if you can be held/locked down. If the 5150 is upheld you lose your firearms and right to buy up to 5 years max. If the 5150 is rescended, your firearms and/or right to purchase must be returned within 30 days max; per that psychiatrist’s order to a County judge. The judge himself cannot overrule a psychiatrist’s order to rescend and return the firearms/purchase power, unless a crime is also involved with the initial detention.
If this all makes sense. I think the Fed law should be 100% identical; if a blanket one was made. I’d want to write it for them in US Code to be sure it’s worded correct with zero room for either political side to wiggle the law for agendas.
The issue though is for that to have any teeth, you need a gun registry so you know what to take, stringent regulation on private sales so the registry doesn't fall behind, further regulations to prevent FOSSCAD/DIY after the fact, etc.
This is without considering the general devil-may-care attitude that police and psychiatrists may take towards those with that inclination. Take one Australian as example: Martin Bryant. Despite having several run ins with police leading up to 1997, as well as active psychiatric help (Martin was prescribed anti-depressants as early as 5 years before) anyone in position to actually do anything, didn't.
Agreed.
Lets have a vote on it after we get rid of all the dangerous criminals that were allowed in to the country and the preexisting ones that were let out on no bail for murder, and etc by the dems and rinos. Then we can see who wants to trade more of their freedom for "security".
Come on guys. We all know that if psycho shooter psyops and dem crime chaos cities weren't happening we wouldn't even be talking about this issue. It isn't even a real issue until they make it one by not enforcing preexisting laws.